{"id":61660,"date":"2026-07-04T10:07:18","date_gmt":"2026-07-04T04:37:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/dcit-it-v-bay-lines-mauritius-2025-235-ttj-435-172-taxmann-com-857-mumtrib\/"},"modified":"2026-07-04T10:07:18","modified_gmt":"2026-07-04T04:37:18","slug":"dcit-it-v-bay-lines-mauritius-2025-235-ttj-435-172-taxmann-com-857-mumtrib","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/dcit-it-v-bay-lines-mauritius-2025-235-ttj-435-172-taxmann-com-857-mumtrib\/","title":{"rendered":"DCIT (IT) v. Bay Lines (Mauritius) (2025) 235 TTJ 435 \/ 172 taxmann.com 857 (Mum)(Trib)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Held that since the effective place of management of the assessee was not in Mauritius, treaty benefit of art. 8 of India-Mauritius DTAA is not available to the assessee; as regards PE in view of the fact that FCIPL is only an agent for booking cargo for the assessee shipping company as per the tariff fixed by it and has no capacity to conclude contracts of any nature and has derived only 22.32 per cent of its revenue from the assessee, FCIPL was an independent agent not carrying out any work wholly and almost wholly for the assessee-company; assessee has thus no PE in India and therefore, income from operation of ships is not taxable in India. (AY. 2013-14 &amp; 2014-15)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 9(1)(i): Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Business connection-Shipping business-Place of effective management-Permanent Establishment-FCIPL is functionally independent of the assessee-FCIPL was doing business for other enterprises also and more than 77.60 per cent of its revenue or the income was from other independent parties and only 22.32 per cent revenue was derived from assessee-FCIPL was an independent agent and not carrying out any work wholly and almost wholly for the assessee-company-Assessee has no agency PE in India-Income from operation of ships is not taxable in India-DTAA-India-Mauritius [S.90, Art. 5, 7,8] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-61660","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-g2w","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61660","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=61660"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61660\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":61661,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61660\/revisions\/61661"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=61660"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=61660"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=61660"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}