{"id":61766,"date":"2026-07-04T10:26:23","date_gmt":"2026-07-04T04:56:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/sanjeev-kumar-kathuria-v-ito-2025-235-ttj-687-173-taxmann-com-9-chd-trib\/"},"modified":"2026-07-04T10:26:23","modified_gmt":"2026-07-04T04:56:23","slug":"sanjeev-kumar-kathuria-v-ito-2025-235-ttj-687-173-taxmann-com-9-chd-trib","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/sanjeev-kumar-kathuria-v-ito-2025-235-ttj-687-173-taxmann-com-9-chd-trib\/","title":{"rendered":"Sanjeev Kumar Kathuria v. ITO 2025) 235 TTJ 687 \/ 173 taxmann.com 9 (Chd) (Trib)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Held that the Assessee acquired the property through a registered gift deed from his father which was acquired by the latter well before 1st April, 2001, and the AO having allowed the assessee to compute the capital gains on the sale of said property by adopting the cost of acquisition based on FMV thereof as on 1st April, 2001, the order passed by the AO cannot be held to be erroneous; AO having thus reached a right conclusion in determining the indexed cost of acquisition for working out the capital gains, the revisional jurisdiction exercised by the Principal CIT under s. 263 cannot be sustained. (AY. 2018-19)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 263: Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Capital gains-Cost of acquisition-Based on FMV  as on 1st April, 2001-Revision order is not valid. [S. 48, 49,55(1)(b)]   <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-61766","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-g4e","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61766","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=61766"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61766\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":61767,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61766\/revisions\/61767"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=61766"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=61766"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=61766"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}