{"id":62069,"date":"2026-07-13T12:09:06","date_gmt":"2026-07-13T06:39:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/laxmi-organic-industries-ltd-v-dcit-2025-237-ttj-268-177-taxmann-com-118-mum-trib-4\/"},"modified":"2026-07-13T12:09:06","modified_gmt":"2026-07-13T06:39:06","slug":"laxmi-organic-industries-ltd-v-dcit-2025-237-ttj-268-177-taxmann-com-118-mum-trib-4","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/laxmi-organic-industries-ltd-v-dcit-2025-237-ttj-268-177-taxmann-com-118-mum-trib-4\/","title":{"rendered":"Laxmi Organic Industries Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 237 TTJ 268 \/ 177 taxmann.com 118 (Mum) Trib)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Held that the computation made by the AO in the final assessment order is not in conformity with the directions issued by the DRP, more specifically, in respect of the claim of deduction made under s. 80IA pertaining to the transfer of steam, and therefore, the assessment order is liable to be quashed. Order passed by the TPO complying with the directions of the DRP is not a fresh or an adverse order nor one requiring appeal or compliance by the assessee and, therefore, the order of the AO is not invalid for the reason that it was not served on the assessee. (AY.2020-21)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 144C: Reference to dispute resolution panel-Direction of DRP-Final assessment order not in conformity with the directions of DRP-The assessment order is quashed-Non-service of order is not invalid.[S.80IA, 144C (13)]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-62069","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-g97","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62069","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=62069"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62069\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":62070,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62069\/revisions\/62070"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=62069"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=62069"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=62069"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}