{"id":62079,"date":"2026-07-13T12:10:30","date_gmt":"2026-07-13T06:40:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/chitra-narendra-parmar-ors-v-acit2025-237-ttj-63-punetrib\/"},"modified":"2026-07-13T12:10:30","modified_gmt":"2026-07-13T06:40:30","slug":"chitra-narendra-parmar-ors-v-acit2025-237-ttj-63-punetrib","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/chitra-narendra-parmar-ors-v-acit2025-237-ttj-63-punetrib\/","title":{"rendered":"Chitra Narendra Parmar &#038; ORS. v. ACIT(2025) 237 TTJ 63 (Pune)(Trib)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Held that the satisfaction note is required to be recorded under S 153C for each assessment year; a consolidated satisfaction note recorded for different assessment years would vitiate the entire assessment proceedings. Tribunal also held that the Jt. CIT\/Addl. CIT had given the approval under s. 153D by referring to the period covered by asst. yrs. 2012-13 to 2018-19 though the incriminating material referred to in the satisfaction note of the Dy. CIT relates to only two assessment years, and without examining the issue as to whether the AO has jurisdiction to issue notice under S 153C when the searched party has approached the Settlement Commission, the approval has been given in a mechanical manner. Approval not being in accordance with the law, the assessment orders are quashed. (AY. 2016-17 &amp; 2017-18)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 153C: Assessment-Income of any other person-Search-Satisfaction note-Required to be recorded for each assessment year-Consolidated satisfaction note recorded for different assessment years-Bad in law-Approval-Mechanical manner-Order quashed. [S. 153D]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-62079","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-g9h","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62079","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=62079"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62079\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":62080,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62079\/revisions\/62080"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=62079"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=62079"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=62079"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}