{"id":62095,"date":"2026-07-13T12:15:14","date_gmt":"2026-07-13T06:45:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/anand-boddapaty-v-pcit-2025-237-ttj-228-178-taxmann-com-423-hydtrib\/"},"modified":"2026-07-13T12:15:14","modified_gmt":"2026-07-13T06:45:14","slug":"anand-boddapaty-v-pcit-2025-237-ttj-228-178-taxmann-com-423-hydtrib","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/anand-boddapaty-v-pcit-2025-237-ttj-228-178-taxmann-com-423-hydtrib\/","title":{"rendered":"Anand Boddapaty v. PCIT (2025) 237 TTJ 228 \/ 178 taxmann.com 423 (Hyd)(Trib)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Held that the assessee claimed exemption under s. 54 on the basis of purchase of property from his wife under an unregistered sale agreement and filed no evidence to prove that he has made any effort to register the property by presenting the document before the registration authorities, the assessment order passed by the AO allowing the claim for exemption on the basis of said sale agreement without conducting relevant enquires is not only erroneous but also prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue and, therefore, the Principal CIT has rightly set aside the assessment order in terms of provisions of s. 263. (AY. 2021-22)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 263: Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Lack of proper enquiry-Assessment order passed by the AO without examining the claim by conducting relevant enquiries which ought to have been carried out-Revision order was affirmed. [S.54] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-62095","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-g9x","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62095","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=62095"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62095\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":62096,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62095\/revisions\/62096"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=62095"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=62095"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=62095"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}