{"id":62385,"date":"2026-07-21T17:27:10","date_gmt":"2026-07-21T11:57:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/m-v-karmari-charitable-trust-v-cit-e-2025-121-itr-3-sn-bang-trib\/"},"modified":"2026-07-21T17:27:10","modified_gmt":"2026-07-21T11:57:10","slug":"m-v-karmari-charitable-trust-v-cit-e-2025-121-itr-3-sn-bang-trib","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/m-v-karmari-charitable-trust-v-cit-e-2025-121-itr-3-sn-bang-trib\/","title":{"rendered":"M. V. Karmari Charitable Trust v. CIT (E) (2025) 121 ITR 3 (SN) (Bang.)(Trib.)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The assessee-trust filed its appeal with a delay of 338 days, explaining that the author of the trust was an aged person having limited access to e-mail communication and no administrative staff, resulting in failure to respond to notices and to file the appeal within time. The Tribunal held that the explanation was bona fide and that substantial justice should prevail over technical considerations. Since there was no deliberate or mala fide delay, the delay was condoned. On merits, the Tribunal observed that the trust could not effectively represent its case before the CIT(E)and, therefore, restored the matter to the CIT (E) with a direction to grant a fresh opportunity to the assessee to produce all relevant documents, audit reports, financial statements and other evidence before passing a fresh order in accordance with law. (AY. 2024-25)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 12AB: Procedure for fresh registration-Delay of 338 days in filing the appeal was condoned-Matter was remanded to the file of CIT(E) for passing a fresh order in accordance with law. [S. 11, 12, 253] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-62385","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-ged","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62385","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=62385"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62385\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":62386,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62385\/revisions\/62386"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=62385"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=62385"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=62385"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}