{"id":63764,"date":"2026-08-04T18:33:34","date_gmt":"2026-08-04T13:03:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/bmw-india-p-ltd-v-dy-cit-2019-108-taxmann-com-419-2025-124-itr-584-delhitrib\/"},"modified":"2026-08-04T18:33:34","modified_gmt":"2026-08-04T13:03:34","slug":"bmw-india-p-ltd-v-dy-cit-2019-108-taxmann-com-419-2025-124-itr-584-delhitrib","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/bmw-india-p-ltd-v-dy-cit-2019-108-taxmann-com-419-2025-124-itr-584-delhitrib\/","title":{"rendered":"BMW India (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2019] 108 taxmann.com 419 \/ (2025) 124 ITR 584 (Delhi)(Trib.)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The assessee claimed deduction of legal and professional charges paid to consultants. The Assessing Officer found that the consultants were not traceable at the addresses furnished and no evidence regarding actual services rendered was produced. The Tribunal held that proof of identity and payment through banking channels alone was insufficient to establish allowability of the expenditure. However, considering the lapse of time between the transaction and the enquiry, the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer to verify whether the payments were genuinely made for services rendered to the assessee. (AY. 2011-12).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 37(1): Business expenditure-Legal and professional charges-Mere proof of payment through banking channels insufficient-Matter remanded for verification of services rendered.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-63764","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-gAs","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63764","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=63764"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63764\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":63765,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63764\/revisions\/63765"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=63764"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=63764"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=63764"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}