{"id":63955,"date":"2026-08-06T15:00:18","date_gmt":"2026-08-06T09:30:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/patanjali-ayurved-ltd-v-dy-cit-2025-174-taxmann-com-170-234-ttj-39-uo-delhitrib\/"},"modified":"2026-08-06T15:00:18","modified_gmt":"2026-08-06T09:30:18","slug":"patanjali-ayurved-ltd-v-dy-cit-2025-174-taxmann-com-170-234-ttj-39-uo-delhitrib","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/patanjali-ayurved-ltd-v-dy-cit-2025-174-taxmann-com-170-234-ttj-39-uo-delhitrib\/","title":{"rendered":"Patanjali Ayurved Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 174 taxmann.com 170 \/ 234 TTJ 39 (UO) (Delhi)(Trib.)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Assessing Officer directed a special audit after obtaining approval from the Commissioner. However, the satisfaction for directing the audit was recorded by both the Assessing Officer and the Commissioner, the audit period was fixed by the Commissioner instead of the Assessing Officer, and extension of time was granted after expiry of the prescribed period on the auditor&#8217;s request instead of the assessee&#8217;s application. The Tribunal held that the mandatory procedure prescribed under sections 142(2A) and 142(2C) had not been followed and, therefore, the assessment framed pursuant to such audit was void ab initio. (AY. 2010-11 to 2012-13).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S.142(2A): Inquiry before assessment-Special audit-Mandatory statutory procedure not followed-Assessment void ab initio.[S. 142(2C), 143(3) 145(3)]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-63955","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-gDx","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63955","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=63955"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63955\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":63956,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63955\/revisions\/63956"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=63955"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=63955"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=63955"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}