{"id":64155,"date":"2026-08-28T16:22:59","date_gmt":"2026-08-28T10:52:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/asst-cit-v-arunkumar-mahabirprasad-jatia-2026-308-taxman-157-sc-editorial-arunkumar-mahabirprasad-jatia-v-acit-2025-180-taxmann-com-102-bomhc\/"},"modified":"2026-08-28T16:22:59","modified_gmt":"2026-08-28T10:52:59","slug":"asst-cit-v-arunkumar-mahabirprasad-jatia-2026-308-taxman-157-sc-editorial-arunkumar-mahabirprasad-jatia-v-acit-2025-180-taxmann-com-102-bomhc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/asst-cit-v-arunkumar-mahabirprasad-jatia-2026-308-taxman-157-sc-editorial-arunkumar-mahabirprasad-jatia-v-acit-2025-180-taxmann-com-102-bomhc\/","title":{"rendered":"Asst. CIT v. Arunkumar Mahabirprasad Jatia (2026) 308 Taxman 157 (SC) Editorial : Arunkumar Mahabirprasad Jatia v.ACIT (2025) 180 taxmann.com 102 (Bom)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Assessing Officer had passed an order under section 148A(d) and issued a reopening notice for initiating reassessment. Assessee filed a writ petition challenging this order and notice as being without jurisdiction. After said petition was filed, a reassessment order was passed based on the order passed under section 148A(d). High Court held that since the order under section 148A(d) was quashed, the reassessment order based on the section 148 notice, which relied on the quashed order, could not survive. Accordingly, the reassessment order was also to be quashed and set aside. SLP of revenue was dismissed on account of delay of 429 days, which could not be explained by the revenue.\u00a0 (AY. 2016-17)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Reassessment notice was quashed-Reassessment order based on the quashed order will not survive-Delay of 429 days-SLP of revenue dismissed on account of delay. [S. 148, 148A(b) 148A(d), Art. 136]   <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-64155","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-gGL","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64155","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=64155"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64155\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":64156,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64155\/revisions\/64156"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=64155"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=64155"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=64155"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}