{"id":64293,"date":"2026-09-04T16:21:07","date_gmt":"2026-09-04T10:51:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/tecumseh-products-india-pvt-ltd-v-dy-cit-2026-485-itr-12-telanganahc\/"},"modified":"2026-09-04T16:21:07","modified_gmt":"2026-09-04T10:51:07","slug":"tecumseh-products-india-pvt-ltd-v-dy-cit-2026-485-itr-12-telanganahc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/tecumseh-products-india-pvt-ltd-v-dy-cit-2026-485-itr-12-telanganahc\/","title":{"rendered":"Tecumseh Products India Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2026) 485 ITR 12 (Telangana)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Held, allowing the petition, that no interim order had been granted by the Supreme Court in any of the matters pending before it. The notice under challenge under sections 148A and 148 was to be set aside and quashed. The Department&#8217;s strategy of awaiting the Supreme Court&#8217;s decision on the pending special leave petitions while continuing to initiate fresh proceedings appears to be a calculated move to buy time and circumvent limitation periods, rather than adhering to the established legal position. Such conduct raises serious questions about the administrative efficiency and the respect for judicial pronouncements, particularly when this court has already provided a balanced approach by preserving both the Department&#8217;s rights and assessees&#8217; interests.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Faceless assessment-Jurisdictional officer-manner Notices issued and proceedings conducted by the jurisdictional officer-Not sustainable-Direction that the order was subject to the outcome of special leave petitions preferred by the Department against the decision of the courts on the same issue before the Supreme Court.[S. 147, 148, 148A(b) 148A(d),151A,  Art. 226] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-64293","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-gIZ","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64293","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=64293"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64293\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":64294,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64293\/revisions\/64294"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=64293"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=64293"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=64293"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}