{"id":64332,"date":"2026-09-04T17:10:49","date_gmt":"2026-09-04T11:40:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/dharmapuri-district-co-operative-milk-producers-union-ltd-v-dy-cit-2026-309-taxman-53-madhc\/"},"modified":"2026-09-04T17:10:49","modified_gmt":"2026-09-04T11:40:49","slug":"dharmapuri-district-co-operative-milk-producers-union-ltd-v-dy-cit-2026-309-taxman-53-madhc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/dharmapuri-district-co-operative-milk-producers-union-ltd-v-dy-cit-2026-309-taxman-53-madhc\/","title":{"rendered":"Dharmapuri District Co-operative Milk Producers Union Ltd. v. Dy.CIT [2026] 309 Taxman 53 (Mad)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The assessee, a co-operative milk union, received a grant-in-aid of 3.50 crores from the Government under a central sector rehabilitation scheme. The Assessing Officer, CIT(A), and Tribunal treated this grant as a revenue receipt. On appeal, the Hon\u2019ble Madras High Court applied the &#8220;purpose test&#8221; laid down by the Supreme Court. The Court found that the text, tenor, and dominant purpose of the financial assistance were to pull the loss-making cooperative out of a financial crunch as part of a rehabilitation plan, with explicit conditions to utilise the funds first for clearing loan liabilities. Performance-related checks were merely ensuring proper utilisation of funds and did not change the character of the receipt. Therefore, the receipt was held to be a capital receipt and not eligible to tax. (AY. 2007-08)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-Capital or revenue-Subsidy\/Grant-in-aid-Government financial assistance granted under a specific rehabilitation scheme to clear liabilities and rescue a cooperative from a financial crisis constitutes a capital receipt. [S. 28(i)]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-64332","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-gJC","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64332","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=64332"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64332\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":64333,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64332\/revisions\/64333"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=64332"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=64332"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=64332"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}