{"id":64374,"date":"2026-09-04T17:24:10","date_gmt":"2026-09-04T11:54:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/manjit-singh-dhaliwal-v-cit-2026-309-taxman-129-delhihc\/"},"modified":"2026-09-04T17:24:10","modified_gmt":"2026-09-04T11:54:10","slug":"manjit-singh-dhaliwal-v-cit-2026-309-taxman-129-delhihc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/manjit-singh-dhaliwal-v-cit-2026-309-taxman-129-delhihc\/","title":{"rendered":"Manjit Singh Dhaliwal v. CIT (2026) 309 Taxman 129 (Delhi)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The assessee, a non-resident senior citizen residing abroad, filed a belated return after selling property in India and earning bank interest, and sought condonation of delay under Section 119(2)(b) citing ignorance of tax laws. The Commissioner rejected the application, holding that ignorance of law does not constitute sufficient cause and no genuine hardship was shown. The rejection was held to be justified, as the assessee failed to establish genuine hardship warranting condonation of delay. (AY. 2020-21)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 119 : Central Board of Direct Taxes-Circular-Return of income-Condonation of delay-For condonation of delay under Section 119(2)(b), mere residence abroad, senior citizen status, or ignorance of tax laws does not constitute sufficient cause or genuine hardship; rejection of the condonation application is justified.  [S. 119(2)(b), 139, Art. 226]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-64374","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-gKi","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64374","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=64374"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64374\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":64375,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64374\/revisions\/64375"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=64374"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=64374"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=64374"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}