{"id":64416,"date":"2026-09-04T17:32:09","date_gmt":"2026-09-04T12:02:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/mukundbhai-manubhai-patel-v-asstt-cit-2026-309-taxman-251-guj-hc\/"},"modified":"2026-09-04T17:32:09","modified_gmt":"2026-09-04T12:02:09","slug":"mukundbhai-manubhai-patel-v-asstt-cit-2026-309-taxman-251-guj-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/mukundbhai-manubhai-patel-v-asstt-cit-2026-309-taxman-251-guj-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Mukundbhai Manubhai Patel v. Asstt. CIT (2026) 309 Taxman 251 (Guj.)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The assessee claimed exemption of dividend income under section 10(35), which was accepted in the original assessment. Subsequently, based on survey findings in the case of a mutual fund house alleging manipulation of dividend distributions and creation of artificial short-term capital losses, the AO reopened the assessment under sections 148A and 148. The High Court held that the assessee&#8217;s purchase of mutual fund units and receipt of dividend income were genuine transactions. Allegations against the mutual fund house could not be attributed to the assessee. Accordingly, the reopening was held to be without jurisdiction, and the notice under section 148, along with the order under section 148A(d), was quashed.(AY. 2018-19)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Dividend received from mutual funds-Reopening of assessment cannot be sustained when it is based solely on third-party survey findings, without any tangible material linking the assessee to the alleged sham transactions. [S. 10(35), 133A, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-64416","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-gKY","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64416","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=64416"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64416\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":64417,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64416\/revisions\/64417"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=64416"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=64416"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=64416"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}