{"id":64430,"date":"2026-09-04T17:36:18","date_gmt":"2026-09-04T12:06:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/ccit-v-sheetal-international-p-ltd-2026-309-taxman-168-sc-editorial-sheetal-international-p-ltd-v-ccit-2025-302-taxman-271-delhihc\/"},"modified":"2026-09-04T17:36:18","modified_gmt":"2026-09-04T12:06:18","slug":"ccit-v-sheetal-international-p-ltd-2026-309-taxman-168-sc-editorial-sheetal-international-p-ltd-v-ccit-2025-302-taxman-271-delhihc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/ccit-v-sheetal-international-p-ltd-2026-309-taxman-168-sc-editorial-sheetal-international-p-ltd-v-ccit-2025-302-taxman-271-delhihc\/","title":{"rendered":"CCIT v. Sheetal International (P.) Ltd. (2026) 309 Taxman 168 (SC) Editorial: Sheetal International (P.) Ltd v. CCIT (2025) 302 Taxman 271 (Delhi)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The first proviso to Section 149(1)(b) requires the determination of whether the time limit prescribed under Section 149(1)(b) of the old regime continues to exist for the assessment year 2021-2022 and before. Resultantly, a notice under Section 148 of the new regime cannot be issued if the period of six years from the end of the relevant assessment year has expired at the time of issuance of the notice. This also ensures that the new time limit of ten years prescribed under Section 149(1)(b) of the new regime applies prospectively. Thus, the notice issued under Section 148 on 01.05.2024 for AY 2017-18 is barred by limitation and quashed by the High Court. \u00a0SLP of the revenue delayed by 320 days. SLP dismissed on account of delay.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 149: Reassessment-Time limit for notice-Notice under section 148 issued beyond the period of limitation prescribed under the first proviso to section 149(1) of the Act is barred by limitation and liable to be quashed-SLP of revenue delayed by 320 days-SLP dismissed on account of delay. [S. 148, Art. 136] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-64430","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-gLc","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64430","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=64430"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64430\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":64431,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64430\/revisions\/64431"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=64430"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=64430"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=64430"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}