{"id":64509,"date":"2026-09-07T12:06:20","date_gmt":"2026-09-07T06:36:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/express-freight-consortium-v-aui-itd-2026-348-ctr-732-183-taxmann-com-91-delhihc\/"},"modified":"2026-09-07T12:06:20","modified_gmt":"2026-09-07T06:36:20","slug":"express-freight-consortium-v-aui-itd-2026-348-ctr-732-183-taxmann-com-91-delhihc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/express-freight-consortium-v-aui-itd-2026-348-ctr-732-183-taxmann-com-91-delhihc\/","title":{"rendered":"Express Freight Consortium v. AUI ITD (2026) 348 CTR 732 \/ 183 taxmann.com 91 (Delhi)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The assessee filed objections against the draft assessment order before the DRP but did not forward a copy thereof to the Assessing Officer. Since the Assessing Officer did not receive the objections, he proceeded on the basis that no objections had been filed and passed the final assessment order under section 144C(4). The High Court held that, although the Assessing Officer was legally justified in drawing such inference, the objections had in fact been filed before the DRP and the consequence of the procedural lapse could not be so drastic as to deprive the assessee of consideration of its objections. Accordingly, the assessment order and consequential demand notice were quashed. The CBDT was also directed to issue appropriate guidelines to prevent recurrence of such situations.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 92C: Transfer pricing-Arm\u2019s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Draft assessment order-Assessment order passed without considering objections filed before DRP cannot be sustained merely because a copy of the objections was not forwarded to the AO. (S. 92CA, 144C(2)(b), 144C(4), Art. 226]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-64509","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-gMt","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64509","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=64509"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64509\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":64510,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64509\/revisions\/64510"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=64509"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=64509"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=64509"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}