{"id":64521,"date":"2026-09-07T12:25:50","date_gmt":"2026-09-07T06:55:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/pcit-v-rajan-rajesh-kumar-2025-181-taxmann-com-750-2026-348-ctr-241-uttarakhandhc\/"},"modified":"2026-09-07T12:25:50","modified_gmt":"2026-09-07T06:55:50","slug":"pcit-v-rajan-rajesh-kumar-2025-181-taxmann-com-750-2026-348-ctr-241-uttarakhandhc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/pcit-v-rajan-rajesh-kumar-2025-181-taxmann-com-750-2026-348-ctr-241-uttarakhandhc\/","title":{"rendered":"PCIT v. Rajan Rajesh Kumar [2025] 181 taxmann.com 750 \/ (2026) 348 CTR 241 (Uttarakhand)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The proposal for initiation of reassessment proceedings was initially rejected by the competent authority, following which the Assessing Officer repeatedly represented the proposal and subsequently obtained approval. The High Court held that the scheme of the Act does not confer any power of review upon either the Assessing Officer or the competent authority under section 151. The order granting or refusing sanction is neither appealable nor revisable, and the repeated presentation of a rejected proposal was without jurisdiction. Accordingly, approval subsequently granted under section 151 and the consequent reopening proceedings were held to be invalid. (AY. 2015-16 &amp; 2016-17)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 151 : Reassessment-Sanction for issue of notice-Multiple presentation for proposal for initiation of reassessment proceedings-Proposal for reopening rejected under section 151 cannot be repeatedly represented for reconsideration and approval. (S. 147, 148, 260A)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-64521","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-gMF","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64521","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=64521"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64521\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":64522,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64521\/revisions\/64522"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=64521"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=64521"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=64521"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}