{"id":64781,"date":"2026-10-05T16:08:21","date_gmt":"2026-10-05T10:38:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/penang-enterprises-p-ltd-v-cbdt-2025-172-taxmann-com-199-bom-hc\/"},"modified":"2026-10-05T16:08:21","modified_gmt":"2026-10-05T10:38:21","slug":"penang-enterprises-p-ltd-v-cbdt-2025-172-taxmann-com-199-bom-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/penang-enterprises-p-ltd-v-cbdt-2025-172-taxmann-com-199-bom-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Penang Enterprises (P.) Ltd. v. CBDT [2025] 172 taxmann.com 199 (Bom.)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The assessee filed a revised return on 18-3-2019 and sought condonation of delay of 496 days in filing Form No. 10CCB for claiming the applicable deduction. The delay occurred due to the absence of the Chief Financial Officer on account of personal difficulties, irregular attendance of a director owing to a family medical emergency and disruption caused by implementation of a new ERP system, which also resulted in errors in the original tax filings. The High Court held that the delay had been sufficiently explained and that the authority ought to adopt a sensitive and pragmatic approach while considering genuine difficulties. The impugned order was quashed and the assessee was permitted to file the requisite returns subject to applicable penalty, fees and interest. (AY. 2017-18)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 119 : Central Board of Direct Taxes-Circular-Condonation of delay-Delay of 496 days in filing Form No. 10CCB-Genuine difficulties faced by CFO and implementation of new ERP system-Delay condoned. [S. 139 (5),  Art. 226] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-64781","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-gQR","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64781","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=64781"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64781\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":64782,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64781\/revisions\/64782"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=64781"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=64781"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=64781"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}