{"id":64893,"date":"2026-10-05T16:29:23","date_gmt":"2026-10-05T10:59:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/nisarg-developers-v-acit-2025-171-taxmann-com-804-bom-hc\/"},"modified":"2026-10-05T16:29:23","modified_gmt":"2026-10-05T10:59:23","slug":"nisarg-developers-v-acit-2025-171-taxmann-com-804-bom-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/nisarg-developers-v-acit-2025-171-taxmann-com-804-bom-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Nisarg Developers v. ACIT [2025] 171 taxmann.com 804 (Bom) (HC)."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Where the assessee, a builder, challenged a high-pitched assessment and sought unconditional stay of demand on the ground of financial hardship, the Assessing Officer having already granted stay of recovery of 80 per cent of the demand subject to payment of 20 per cent thereof, and the assessee having failed to furnish genuine evidence of financial hardship despite adequate opportunity, the High Court held that adequate reasons had been given for insisting upon payment of 20 per cent of the demand and no case was made out for grant of unconditional stay.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Stay of demand-20 per cent deposit-Financial hardship-Unconditional stay not justified. [Art. 226] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-64893","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-gSF","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64893","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=64893"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64893\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":64894,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64893\/revisions\/64894"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=64893"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=64893"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=64893"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}