{"id":64897,"date":"2026-10-05T16:29:51","date_gmt":"2026-10-05T10:59:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/mahesh-mathuradass-ganatra-v-cpc-2025-175-taxmann-com-234-bom-hc\/"},"modified":"2026-10-05T16:29:51","modified_gmt":"2026-10-05T10:59:51","slug":"mahesh-mathuradass-ganatra-v-cpc-2025-175-taxmann-com-234-bom-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/mahesh-mathuradass-ganatra-v-cpc-2025-175-taxmann-com-234-bom-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Mahesh Mathuradass Ganatra v. CPC [2025] 175 taxmann.com 234 (Bom) (HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Where the assessee had voluntarily deposited 20 per cent of the tax demand for assessment year 2015-16 even before filing the stay application, in accordance with Instruction No. 1914, and the stay application remained pending for nearly six years, the High Court held that the Revenue was not justified in adjusting the refund due for assessment year 2022-23 against the demand for assessment year 2015-16; the delay in adjudicating the stay application was not attributable to the assessee and the Revenue ought not to have adjusted the refund after the assessee had complied with the applicable requirement. (AY. 2015-16).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 220: Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Stay of demand-Pendency of appeal before CIT(A)-Payment of 20 per cent of demand-Adjustment of subsequent refund-Not justified.[S. 245, 250(6A),Art. 226]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-64897","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-gSJ","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64897","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=64897"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64897\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":64898,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64897\/revisions\/64898"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=64897"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=64897"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=64897"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}