{"id":65276,"date":"2026-10-30T12:05:11","date_gmt":"2026-10-30T06:35:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/acit-v-bharat-petroleum-corporation-ltd-2026-310-taxman-89-sc-editorial-bharat-petroleum-corporation-ltd-v-acit2025-176-taxmann-com-103-478-itr-358-bomhc\/"},"modified":"2026-10-30T12:05:11","modified_gmt":"2026-10-30T06:35:11","slug":"acit-v-bharat-petroleum-corporation-ltd-2026-310-taxman-89-sc-editorial-bharat-petroleum-corporation-ltd-v-acit2025-176-taxmann-com-103-478-itr-358-bomhc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/acit-v-bharat-petroleum-corporation-ltd-2026-310-taxman-89-sc-editorial-bharat-petroleum-corporation-ltd-v-acit2025-176-taxmann-com-103-478-itr-358-bomhc\/","title":{"rendered":"ACIT v. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (2026) 310 Taxman 89 (SC) Editorial : Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd v. ACIT(2025) 176 taxmann.com 103\/ 478 ITR 358 (Bom)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Allowing the petition, the Court held that, where during original scrutiny under section 143(3) the assessee had fully disclosed the receipt of dividend from a trust and the claim of investment allowance and the Assessing Officer had examined the same, reopening after four years based on a mere bald allegation of failure to disclose material facts amounted to a change of opinion. Notice under section 148 and the order rejecting objections were quashed.\u00a0 SLP of revenue dismissed. (AY. 2013-14, 2014-15.)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S.147: Reassessment-After expiry of four years-No failure to disclose material facts-Change of opinion-Dividend from trust-Investment allowance wrongly claimed-Reopening invalid-SLP of revenue dismissed.  [S. 2(22)(e), 10(34), 32AC, 115-O, 143(3), 148, Art.136]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-65276","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-gYQ","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65276","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=65276"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65276\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":65277,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65276\/revisions\/65277"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=65276"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=65276"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=65276"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}