{"id":65363,"date":"2026-10-30T16:44:26","date_gmt":"2026-10-30T11:14:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/ernst-and-young-llp-v-acitit-2026-310-taxman-25-delhihc\/"},"modified":"2026-10-30T16:44:26","modified_gmt":"2026-10-30T11:14:26","slug":"ernst-and-young-llp-v-acitit-2026-310-taxman-25-delhihc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/ernst-and-young-llp-v-acitit-2026-310-taxman-25-delhihc\/","title":{"rendered":"Ernst and Young LLP v. ACIT(IT) [2026] 310 Taxman 25 (Delhi)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Petitioner-LLP challenged an order dated 16-01-2026 and a withholding tax certificate dated 28-01-2026 issued under Section 195 for FY 2025-26 (AY 2026-27). For the same assessment year, High Court, on 14-01-2026, in the petitioner&#8217;s own case, recorded a finding of no taxability, rejected the claim of the Assessing Officer regarding the recipient having a virtual service permanent establishment in India and remanded the matter for a fresh order. Notwithstanding the above, the competent authority issued a certificate under Section 195 at a 5.25% rate on 28-01-2026 instead of issuing a &#8216;Nil&#8217; rate certificate. On writ, the Court held that instead of setting aside and remanding matter to the competent authority to issue a certificate at &#8216;Nil&#8217; rate, the certificate dated 28-01-2026 which the respondent had issued to the petitioner would be treated as a certificate of &#8216;Nil&#8217; rate instead of a certificate of 5.25%. Court also held that the competent officer or any other authority who was supposed to consider the petitioner&#8217;s application under Section 195 would issue a certificate of &#8216;Nil&#8217; rate of tax not only for Financial Year 2025-26 (AY 2026-27), but also for subsequent years in case an application was filed. Further, the competent authority dealing with the petitioner&#8217;s subsequent application(s) under Section 195 would not be bound by the direction given above if he came to a conclusion and recorded a finding that the petitioner had a PE in India and transactions which company had carried out in India were liable to be taxed in India. (AY. 2026-27)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 195 : Deduction at source-Non-resident-Other sums-Virtual service-Petitioner-LLP was issued a certificate under section 195 at 5.25% despite a prior High Court finding of no taxability and remand, certificate was to be treated as one of &#8216;Nil&#8217; rate rather than 5.25% for relevant and subsequent years if application was made, and competent authority could depart from this only if it found a PE in India or taxability on merits in future applications-DTAA-India-UK [S. 9(1)(i), Art. 5, Art. 226] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-65363","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-h0f","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65363","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=65363"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65363\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":65364,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65363\/revisions\/65364"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=65363"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=65363"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=65363"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}