{"id":7369,"date":"2019-09-24T06:16:13","date_gmt":"2019-09-24T06:16:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/omprakash-kukreja-v-acit-2019-308-ctr-68-176-dtr-244-mphc\/"},"modified":"2019-09-24T06:16:13","modified_gmt":"2019-09-24T06:16:13","slug":"omprakash-kukreja-v-acit-2019-308-ctr-68-176-dtr-244-mphc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/omprakash-kukreja-v-acit-2019-308-ctr-68-176-dtr-244-mphc\/","title":{"rendered":"Omprakash Kukreja v. ACIT (2019) 308 CTR 68 \/ 176 DTR 244 (MP)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On appeal, the High Court held that, when there is a finding of fact that on the basis of the physical verification, a difference was found in the goods with the assessee, Tribunal cannot be said to have erred in sustaining such additions made as it was not solely basis a retracted statement of employees but basis the physical verification of stock. There being no other material to prove to contrary, restriction of addition to a sum of Rs.10 lakhs by way of estimate and preponderance of probability cannot be said to be arbitrary and illegal (ITA No.4 of 2016 dt. 16-01-2019) (AY. 2007-08)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 69 : Unexplained investments\u2013Excess stock-Restriction of addition to a sum of Rs. 10 lacs by way of estimate and preponderance of probability cannot be said to be arbitrary and illegal.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7369","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-digest"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-1UR","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7369","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7369"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7369\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7370,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7369\/revisions\/7370"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7369"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7369"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7369"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}