{"id":20225,"date":"2021-07-16T12:17:56","date_gmt":"2021-07-16T06:47:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/?post_type=qa&#038;p=20225"},"modified":"2021-07-17T09:18:29","modified_gmt":"2021-07-17T03:48:29","slug":"judgment-u-s-147","status":"publish","type":"qa","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/qa\/judgment-u-s-147\/","title":{"rendered":"Send us the  copy of Judgment on reassessment , in CIT v. Smithkline Beecham Consumer Brands Ltd. (2003) 126 Taxman 104 (Chd.) (Mag.)."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Need a case law of CIT v. Smithkline Beecham Consumer Brands Ltd. (2003) 126 Taxman 104 (Chd.) (Mag.).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","qa_expert":[139],"qa_category":[23],"qa_tag":[136,294],"class_list":["post-20225","qa","type-qa","status-publish","hentry","qa_expert-research-team","qa_category-income-tax","qa_tag-reassessment","qa_tag-rule-27a"],"acf":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/qa\/20225","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/qa"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/qa"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20225"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20225"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"qa_expert","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/qa_expert?post=20225"},{"taxonomy":"qa_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/qa_category?post=20225"},{"taxonomy":"qa_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/qa_tag?post=20225"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}