• Welcome to itatonline.org Forum.
 

News:

Contact details of departmental representatives is available.

Main Menu
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - rajul5234

#31
Discussion / Notification for deduction u/s 80IA(4)
August 20, 2016, 10:14:57 AM
SCA 17118/14. Dt. 8 & 9 /8/16. Devraj infrastructures ltd. Guj. H C

Held, Certificate f local authority is an essential requirement for deduction u/s 80IA(4), but appending evidence for completion of work for commencement of industrial park cannot be ignored for issuance of notification by CBDT if substantial requirements  for project completion are complied with.

R K Patel
#32
Discussion / Penalty u/s 271E
August 20, 2016, 10:01:27 AM
TA 648/07. Dated 4/8/16. Patel gokul jeram. Gujarat high court

Deleted penalty u/s 271E based on circular applied  in decision.

R K Patel
#33
Discussion / Undisclosed capital gains
August 20, 2016, 09:58:52 AM
Gujarat high court. TA 801/2007, dated 10/8/16

held, Investment in shares to be proved by revenue to hold assessee is liable for tax towards undisclosed capital gains.

R K Patel
#34
Discussion / Unexplained receipts based on jottings
August 12, 2016, 05:00:06 PM
Bharatkumar. R. Joshi. Gujarat high court. Tax appeal 1474 / 2008, dated 1/8/16.

Held that no addition sustainable on base of jottings having no nexus with business of assessee.

R K Patel
#35
Please take a print from Gujarat High Couet website. I am unable to annex, though I tried my best.
#36
TA 207/2008. Ramanlal B Patel. Gujarat H . C. Dt. 20/7/16.

Addition not sustainable if based solely on statement retracted and order is a nullity due to lack of opportunity of cross examination.

R K Patel
#37
Discussion / Penalty s. 271(1)(c)
July 31, 2016, 02:37:52 PM
GUJARAT HIGH COURT. SOMA TEXTILES. TA 1286/09. Dt. 18.7.16
Even if quantum addition is confirmed, penalty u/s 271(1)(c) not leviable though auditor has made a mistake in his report of non disclosure and books are not produced at assessment stage.

R K Patel
#38
Discussion / VDIS & stock adjustment
July 23, 2016, 10:49:59 PM
M/S. L M Patel & sons. TA 376/2007. Dt. 13/7/16. GUJ H C

Held, There has to be an adjustment entry of valuation of closing stock in subsequent year as a consequence to accepted VDIS proceedings.

R K Patel
#39
Gujarat high court. TA 1437/2007. Chetnaben  J. Shah Dt. 14/7/16

Held, Mere speculation of earning of income cannot be a ground for addition based on statement in search without any support of docement or corroborative evidence.
CBDT circulars considered by court.

R K Patel
#40
Discussion / s.69C & s. 80JJA
July 23, 2016, 10:41:46 PM
TA 725 / 2006. Aman biocol. Dt. 5/7/16. GUJ. H C 

Court held that if money is withdrawn from bank and paid for purchases of raw material and production has resulted, s.69 C fails , more so if income of assessee is exempt.

R K Patel
#41
Discussion / s. 145 and specific additions
July 23, 2016, 10:37:37 PM
Guj. H. C. TA 1255/2009 & others. Dt. 1/7/16, Prashant oil mill.

Held, If books are rejected u/s 145, specific additions cannot be made based on those books and best judgement is to be done on basis of history and nature of business and net profit rate in previous year.

R K Patel
#42
Discussion / s.158BFA(2) penalty
July 07, 2016, 12:42:48 PM
TA 1349 / 2008. Dt. 16/6/16. Bipinchandra Bhatia. (Guj.)

Held, Penalty u/s 158BFA is not automatic and is not leviable simply as a consequence to confirmation of quantum additions in appeals.

R K Patel
#43
Discussion / s. 80IB(8A)
June 25, 2016, 09:44:38 AM
TA 233/2016. Dt. 16/6/16. B A Research. Guj. H C.

Interpretation of s. 80IB(8A) & R. 18D & DA

R K Patel
#44
Sahjanand medical technologies. SCA 3399 / 2016. Dt. 15/6/16. (Guj)

Held, Reopening invalid if at instance of dictates of Audit party resorting to instruction no. 16 dt. 31/10/13 when Assessing officer differs from view of audit party.

R K Patel
#45
Discussion / Stamp duty expense
June 21, 2016, 03:21:30 PM
Guj. H C. TA 414 / 2007. Dt. 14/6/16. M/s Pruthvi Associates.

Held, Stamp duty paid for execution of contract is a revenue expenditure.

R K Patel