Text only | Text with Images

itatonline.org Forum

Ask your queries or reply to others' queries => Discussion => Topic started by: ddshah on August 24, 2007, 01:05:35 AM

Title: re: 143(2) in Block proceedings
Post by: ddshah on August 24, 2007, 01:05:35 AM
Is notice u/s. 143(2) required to be issued in Block proceedings.

Is there any decision in favour after considering the negative decision of Special Bench in Naval Kishore and recent Gauhati High Court decision saying that the notice is mandatory.
Title: Re: re: 143(2) in Block proceedings
Post by: avsonde on August 29, 2007, 08:05:23 PM
See Vin Vish (Mumbai) under unreported decisions Tribunal which follows Gauhati but without considering the SB decision which was not cited and Tulika (Delhi) where both were cited and Gauhati was followed.Both cases are available on this website
Title: Re: re: 143(2) in Block proceedings
Post by: ddshah on February 12, 2008, 12:03:01 AM
Is there any latest decision on the issue from Mumbai ITAT after considering Pune ITAT and Del ITAT (in 111 TTJ)?
Title: Re: re: 143(2) in Block proceedings
Post by: ashutosh majumdar on February 14, 2008, 03:18:39 PM
Hi,

See the judgement in Aurangabad Holiday Resorts reported at http://www.itatonline.org/judgements_tribunal.php.

The Tribunal has considered whether the non-jurisdictional High Court can prevail over the Special bench. It is an excellent discussion of the law.

Regards,

Ashutosh.
Title: Re: re: 143(2) in Block proceedings
Post by: ddshah on February 14, 2008, 11:43:38 PM
That's the decision earlier I refered to as pune itat decision. Is theer any recent decision of Mumbai Bench on similar issue?
Text only | Text with Images