itatonline.org Forum

Ask your queries or reply to others' queries => Discussion => Topic started by: subash agarwal,Adv kolkata on March 17, 2013, 01:53:19 PM

Title: TRADING IN CURRENCY FUTURES – WHETHER SPECULATIVE?
Post by: subash agarwal,Adv kolkata on March 17, 2013, 01:53:19 PM
TRADING IN CURRENCY FUTURES – WHETHER SPECULATIVE?

Read this exclusive article at

http://subashagarwal.blogspot.in/search/label/TRADING%20IN%20CURRENCY%20FUTURES%20%E2%80%93%20WHETHER%20SPECULATIVE%3F
Title: Re: TRADING IN CURRENCY FUTURES – WHETHER SPECULATIVE?
Post by: vsaiyar on March 17, 2013, 08:59:43 PM
you have restricted your discussion to section43(5) and did not deal with Sec.73.  Without discussing the issues involved in sec.73 the discussion is incomplete.
Title: Re: TRADING IN CURRENCY FUTURES – WHETHER SPECULATIVE?
Post by: camanojgupta on March 17, 2013, 10:58:13 PM
The Central Government notified the following stock exchanges as recognised stock exchanges for the purposes of the clause (ii) in the Explanation to clause (d) of the proviso to clause (5) of section 43
(A) National Stock Exchange of India Limited, Mumbai
(B) Bombay Stock Exchange Limited, Mumbai
(C) MCX Stock Exchange Ltd. [ This exchange undertakes derivative transaction in cuurency only. Commodity derivative transactions are carried out at Multi Commodity Exchange of India Ltd.]
(D) United Stock Exchange of India Limited [  [ This exchange undertakes derivative transaction in cuurency only.]
Derivative transactions done at above exchanges are treated as business transactions.
CA MANOJ GUPTA
JODHPUR
09828510543
Title: Re: TRADING IN CURRENCY FUTURES – WHETHER SPECULATIVE?
Post by: subash agarwal,Adv kolkata on March 18, 2013, 01:58:13 PM
Dear Manojji,

Thanks for your feedback. I have made necessary changes in the article.


Regards!!!
Title: Re: TRADING IN CURRENCY FUTURES – WHETHER SPECULATIVE?
Post by: subash agarwal,Adv kolkata on March 18, 2013, 02:02:36 PM
Dear Mr.vsaiyar,

Expl. to sec 73 applies to trading in shares only  as explicitly mentioned in the provision. So, I did not deem it necessary to deal with the same.

Thanks & Regards!!!