ITAT issues guidelines for stay of demand.
Quote from: sanganeriask on December 05, 2018, 01:05:08 PM
my client had pledged some listed shares to a financial institution for availing a loan. On failure to repay the loan the lender invoked the pledged shares and sold the shares thru stock exchange in their name and credited the proceeds in the loan account. My query is that whether the loss incurred on such sale is allowable to be set off with capital gain arising on sale of other shares on which STT is not paid.
Quote from: Ashish kumar on May 07, 2019, 09:01:42 PM
On 6th July 2018, the Ministry of law and Justice issued a Notification, by virtue of which it has invited applications from professionals for the post of ITAT Members. As per this Notification the members who have completed 10 years of profession and have age between 35 to 50 are entitled for the post of member after facing an interview.
In response to this advertisement around 750 applications were received out of which 600 candidates have been shortlisted for interview.
Now on 3rd May a new development has happened that is only 150 candidates have been filtered out of 600. When the undersigned has enquired the things from reliable sources then it is emerge that only those candidates who have completed 20 years of profession and have some reasonable income are being called for interview. And the rest of the professionals have been out rightly rejected. Now my question to the legal luminaries of the Bar, a bar which has been founded by Great Shri Nani Palkhiwala, that is not injustice to those candidates whose candidature has been rejected out rightly without any interview. Whether it is not violation of fundamental rights of the professional who are eligible as per the provisions of Act and Rules of ITAT.
My humble request is that necessary action in this regard may be initiated otherwise days are not far when only revenue side and judicial services side persons would be appointed. And no body aware that under GST, the area where I am practicing, the new provisions have no space for advocates or CA. Similarly slowly and gradually this practice would come under Income Tax Tribunal also and then only God knows what would happen to a poor assessee who visit ITAT in hope of justice. Since I am a Chartered accountant and not possessing much knowledge of law. I don't know where the remedy lies
Thank you and Jai Hind
Quote from: Ashish kumar on September 26, 2019, 07:07:29 PM
Hello friends recently I have visited USA in order to attend conference of NATP, it was a great session, I am fully amazed, observing the respect to the verdicts of Highest Judicial Fora, the lower Judicial officers pay great respect to the mycfavisit observations made by the Apex Body, they completely bow down to the guidelines, irrespective of their personal benefits. When i hung around and took a survey, I found the reason behind this respect and that is the respect to the concept of Rule of Law, Rule of law is a concept developed by AV Diecy in his book Constitution of London way back. All the legal luminaries be the judicial officers and be the practitioners, follow the concept of rule of law. It is not merely in the interest of judicial system, they said, but also in the interest of nation, since FDI in those countries would not come where there is no rule of law. For example the present position of lndia, people think that judgments of ITAT r buried only here in India but I found that each and every judgment be it on penny stock be it on section 68, be it on transfer pricing have been analyzed at length by the in house legal brains of the Foreign players who explore the environment of a state before investing in that state, in fact i got a shock of 440 Volt when I found that are watching the transfer and posting of members at Important stations tellgamestop. One of them shown me the data of last 10 years transfer of posting and also the judgment of Ajay Gandhi. I was surprised to see this minuscule research of the professionals of foreign investors. They openly said why one would invest in such a country where there is no respect of rule of law, as ultimately the investor would suffer and incur losses. Similarly there are so many other things they have shown to me which would when confront to the Govt of India here then a chaotic situation may arise. They really appreciate the ITAT Bar of Bombay which a Committee of Ethics.
Quote from: ASRAO on March 28, 2019, 02:09:30 PM
In the year of the death section 159 will comes into existence and along with it section 168 comes into existence if property is not distributed to legal heirs
Quote from: rajul5234 on August 30, 2017, 12:11:02 PM
TA 631/2017, dated 28/8/17. Gautam Jhaveri GUJ H C
Held, Past penalty by SEBi has no relevance to evidence on record for year under consideration.
R K Patel
Quote from: ASRAO on December 11, 2019, 02:45:37 PM
There is no prohibition under Income Tax Act upon cross gifting thus it can also be used as measure for cash deposits made during demonetization period.