{"id":10467,"date":"2017-12-02T11:14:34","date_gmt":"2017-12-02T05:44:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.itatonline.org\/info\/?p=10467"},"modified":"2017-12-02T11:14:57","modified_gmt":"2017-12-02T05:44:57","slug":"cbdt-suspends-ao-for-converting-ltd-scrutiny-into-full-scrutiny-with-mala-fide-intention","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/cbdt-suspends-ao-for-converting-ltd-scrutiny-into-full-scrutiny-with-mala-fide-intention\/","title":{"rendered":"CBDT Suspends AO For Converting Ltd Scrutiny Into Full Scrutiny With Mala Fide Intention"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The CBDT has sent a strong message to all unscrupulous AOs that it will no longer tolerate their shenanigans of harassing taxpayers with a view to extort bribes. The usual modus operandi of such AO\u2019s is to conduct roving inquiries and threaten to make huge additions unless the hapless taxpayer agrees to pay a bribe. The CBDT has put an end to this nefarious practice by directing that all cases where a limited scrutiny is converted into a full scrutiny should be backed with an order sheet entry in which reasons are given. The approval of the Pr CIT has also been made a precondition. An officer who defied this directive has been placed under suspension as his action gave rise to a &#8220;<em>very strong suspicion of mala fide intentions<\/em>&#8220;. <\/p>\n<p><script async src=\"\/\/pagead2.googlesyndication.com\/pagead\/js\/adsbygoogle.js\"><\/script><br \/>\n<!-- responsive --><br \/>\n<ins class=\"adsbygoogle\"\n     style=\"display:block\"\n     data-ad-client=\"ca-pub-6440093791992877\"\n     data-ad-slot=\"6406297397\"\n     data-ad-format=\"auto\"><\/ins><br \/>\n<script>\n(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});\n<\/script> <\/p>\n<div class=\"journal2\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.itatonline.org\/info\/cbdt-suspends-ao-for-converting-ltd-scrutiny-into-full-scrutiny-with-mala-fide-intention\/cbdt-full-scrutiny-directive\/#dlcenter\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-10470\">Click here to download the directive dated 30.11.2017 issued by the CBDT to all AOs<\/a> <\/div>\n<blockquote><p>F. No. DGIT(Vig.)\/HQ\/Sl\/2017-18<br \/>\nGovernment of India<br \/>\nMinistry of Finance<br \/>\nDepartment of Revenue<br \/>\nCentral Board of Direct Taxes<\/p>\n<p>New Delhi-11 0001<br \/>\nDated: 30th November, 2017<\/p>\n<p>Subject: Unauthorized expansion of the scope of limited scrutiny- instructions- reg.<\/p>\n<p>CBDT has issued detailed guidelines\/ directions for completion of cases of limited scrutiny selected through CASS module. These guidelines postulate that an Assessing Officer, in limited scrutiny cases, cannot travel beyond the issues for which the case was selected. The idea behind such stipulations was to enforce checks and balances upon powers of an AO to do fishing and roving inquiries in cases selected for limited scrutiny.<\/p>\n<p>2. Further, the  guidelines  for  proper  maintenance  of  order  sheets  have  been  given  in  the Manual of Office  Procedure  issued  by  the  Directorate  of  Organisation  and  Management Services. The Manual clearly lays down:<\/p>\n<p>A. The minutes of the hearing must be entered with date, in the order-sheet.<\/p>\n<p>B. Make proper order-sheet entries for each posting, hearing and seeking and granting of adjournments.<\/p>\n<p>C. If nobody attends a hearing or the request for adjournment comes after the hearing date, enter the facts in the order-sheet.<\/p>\n<p>Maintenance of a cursory and cryptic order sheet shows irresponsible, ad hoc and undisciplined working of any officer.<\/p>\n<p>3. Instances have come to notice of CBDT where some Assessing Officers are travelling beyond their jurisdiction while making assessments in Limited Scrutiny cases by initiating inquiries on new issues without complying with mandatory requirements of the relevant CBDT Instructions dated 26.09.2014, 29.12.2015 and 14.07.2016. These instances have been viewed very seriously by the CBDT and in one case the Central Inspection Team of the CBDT was tasked with examination of assessment records on receipt of allegations of several irregularities. Amongst other irregularities it was found that no reasons had been recorded for expanding the scope of limited scrutiny, no approval was taken from the PCIT for conversion of the limited scrutiny case to a complete scrutiny case and the order sheet was maintained very perfunctorily. This gave rise to a very strong suspicion of mala fide intentions. The Officer concerned has been placed under suspension.<\/p>\n<p>In view of discussion in the preceding paragraphs it is once again reiterated that the Assessing Officers should abide by the instructions of CBDT while completing limited scrutiny assessments and should be scrupulous about maintenance of note sheets in assessment folders.<\/p>\n<p>(Rakesh Gupta)<br \/>\nADG (V) HQ-I<br \/>\nNew Delhi<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The CBDT has sent a strong message to all unscrupulous AOs that it will no longer tolerate their shenanigans of harassing taxpayers with a view to extort bribes. The usual modus operandi of such AO\u2019s is to conduct roving inquiries and threaten to make huge additions unless the hapless taxpayer agrees to pay a bribe. The CBDT has put an end to this nefarious practice by directing that all cases where a limited scrutiny is converted into a full scrutiny should be backed with an order sheet entry in which reasons are given. The approval of the Pr CIT has also been made a precondition. An officer who defied this directive has been placed under suspension as his action gave rise to a &#8220;<em>very strong suspicion of mala fide intentions<\/em>&#8220;<\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/cbdt-suspends-ao-for-converting-ltd-scrutiny-into-full-scrutiny-with-mala-fide-intention\/\">Read more &#8250;<\/a><\/div>\n<p><!-- end of .read-more --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-10467","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-all-information","category-others"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10467","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10467"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10467\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10467"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10467"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10467"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}