{"id":15822,"date":"2021-01-27T08:46:53","date_gmt":"2021-01-27T03:16:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/?p=15822"},"modified":"2021-01-27T08:46:53","modified_gmt":"2021-01-27T03:16:53","slug":"separate-benches-of-the-honble-supreme-court-effective-efficient-justice-to-the-common-man","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/separate-benches-of-the-honble-supreme-court-effective-efficient-justice-to-the-common-man\/","title":{"rendered":"Separate Benches Of The Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court: Effective &#038; Efficient Justice To The Common Man"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On Sunday, January 24,  2021, the five State Bar Councils i.e., Telangana, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu,  Karnataka and Kerala have unanimously demanded a <a href=\"https:\/\/timesofindia.indiatimes.com\/india\/bar-councils-of-five-states-call-for-an-sc-bench-in-south-india\/articleshow\/80440609.cms\">Supreme  Court Bench in South India<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>This demand has arisen  on account of accessibility and costs incurred by the litigant to access the  Hon&rsquo;ble Supreme Court, which is currently situated at Delhi.<\/p>\n<p>Recently, in November  2020, the Attorney General of India, Shri K. K. Venugopal had proposed the idea  of four benches of Court of Appeal i.e., North, East, West and South. Each of  these Courts will have 15 judges with the same as judges of the Supreme Court.  He further stated that the same would require a Constitutional amendment.<\/p>\n<p>It is pertinent to  acknowledge that Dr. K. Shivaram, Senior Advocate during his tenure as the  National President of the All India Federation of tax Practitioners (<strong>AIFTP<\/strong>)  had <a href=\"https:\/\/aiftponline.org\/journal\/2020\/december-2020\/presidents-communique-58\/\">made  a similar suggestion to constitute four benches of the Hon&rsquo;ble Supreme Court<\/a>.  Further, the Bar Council of Maharashtra &amp; Goa vide letter dated April 11, 2000  also endorsed the view of the Federation. <\/p>\n<p>Further, in January  2013, AIFTP, as an alternative, proposed the idea of <a href=\"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/blog\/dare-to-dream-beyond-supreme-court-get-ready-for-e-supreme-court\/\">E-Benches  of the Hon&rsquo;ble Supreme Court<\/a> at various High Courts to  adjudicate upon Special Leave Petitions. This idea was <a href=\"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/blog\/new-india-vision-voice-of-professionals-suggestions-for-speedy-disposal-of-matters-and-effective-administration-of-justice\/\">reiterated  and appealed to the Hon&rsquo;ble Prime Minister, Shri Narendra Modi in 2019 as a  measure for &lsquo;New India Vision &amp; Road Map&rsquo;<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>As the English proverb  goes, &ldquo;necessity is the mother of invention&rdquo;. The Nation-wide lockdown on  account of the pandemic has remoulded our idea of access to justice. With some  hiccups at the initial stages, the virtual Courts have delivered justice during  the difficult times. <\/p>\n<p>At this stage with  alternative proposals in hand, certain measures should be adopted for speedy  and cost-effective justice to the common man. It is rather unfair for a  litigant to bear the transport, accommodation and legal fee (including whims  and fancies) to procure justice. <\/p>\n<p>A positive change is  sincerely hoped for.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Five State Bar Councils i.e., Telangana, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and Kerala have unanimously demanded a <a href=\"https:\/\/timesofindia.indiatimes.com\/india\/bar-councils-of-five-states-call-for-an-sc-bench-in-south-india\/articleshow\/80440609.cms\">Supreme Court Bench in South India<\/a>. This demand has arisen on account of accessibility and costs incurred by the litigant to access the  Hon&rsquo;ble Supreme Court, which is currently situated at Delhi.<\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/separate-benches-of-the-honble-supreme-court-effective-efficient-justice-to-the-common-man\/\">Read more &#8250;<\/a><\/div>\n<p><!-- end of .read-more --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15822","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-all-information","category-supreme-courthigh-court-related"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15822","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15822"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15822\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15822"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15822"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15822"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}