{"id":2190,"date":"2012-09-24T19:23:23","date_gmt":"2012-09-24T19:23:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.itatonline.org\/info\/?p=2190"},"modified":"2012-09-24T19:29:38","modified_gmt":"2012-09-24T19:29:38","slug":"cbdt-expresses-extreme-concern-after-supreme-courts-critisism-of-delay","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/cbdt-expresses-extreme-concern-after-supreme-courts-critisism-of-delay\/","title":{"rendered":"CBDT Expresses &#8220;Extreme Concern&#8221; After Supreme Court&#8217;s Criticism of Delay"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Pursuant to the <em>scathing criticism<\/em> of the Supreme Court in <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/index.php\/probe-peculiar-phenomena-of-delay-in-high-stake-appeals-low-tax-effect-circular\/\">DIT vs. Citibank N.A.<\/a><\/strong> on the &#8220;<em>peculiar phenomenon<\/em>&#8221; of delay in filing high stakes appeals and the directive that the concerned officials be hauled up, the CBDT has issued a letter dated 19.09.2012 expressing &#8220;<em>extreme concern<\/em>&#8221; and directing the CCITs &#038; DGITs to impress upon the field formation to strictly adhere to the timelines laid down in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.itatonline.org\/info\/index.php\/depts-guidelines-for-zero-delay-regime-in-filing-appeals-slps\/\">Instruction No. 4 of 2011<\/a> &#038; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.itatonline.org\/info\/index.php\/depts-guidelines-on-when-how-to-fileoppose-s-260a-appeals-in-high-court\/\">Instruction No. 7 of 2011<\/a>. It has been made clear that excuses like heavy workload and leave are not acceptable. It has also been threatened that delay in filing appeals\/ SLPs may attract administrative action. <\/p>\n<div class=\"journal2\">\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-content\/plugins\/wp-downloadmanager\/images\/ext\/pdf.gif\" alt=\"\" title=\"\" style=\"vertical-align: middle;\" \/>&nbsp;&nbsp;<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/download\/delay.pdf\">CBDT's letter dated 19.09.2012 on delay in filing appeals & SLPs<\/a><\/strong> (24.3 KiB, 904 hits)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Pursuant to the <em>scathing criticism<\/em> of the Supreme Court in <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/itatonline.org\/archives\/index.php\/probe-peculiar-phenomena-of-delay-in-high-stake-appeals-low-tax-effect-circular\/\">DIT vs. Citibank N.A.<\/a><\/strong> on the &#8220;<em>peculiar phenomenon<\/em>&#8221; of delay in filing high stakes appeals and the directive that the concerned officials be hauled up, the CBDT has issued a letter dated 19.09.2012 expressing &#8220;<em>extreme concern<\/em>&#8221; and directing the CCITs &#038; DGITs to impress upon the field formation to strictly adhere to the timelines laid down in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.itatonline.org\/info\/index.php\/depts-guidelines-for-zero-delay-regime-in-filing-appeals-slps\/\">Instruction No. 4 of 2011<\/a> &#038; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.itatonline.org\/info\/index.php\/depts-guidelines-on-when-how-to-fileoppose-s-260a-appeals-in-high-court\/\">Instruction No. 7 of 2011<\/a>. It has been made clear that excuses like heavy workload and leave are not acceptable. It has also been threatened that delay in filing appeals\/ SLPs may attract administrative action<\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/cbdt-expresses-extreme-concern-after-supreme-courts-critisism-of-delay\/\">Read more &#8250;<\/a><\/div>\n<p><!-- end of .read-more --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,7,6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2190","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-all-information","category-others","category-supreme-courthigh-court-related"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2190","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2190"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2190\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2190"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2190"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2190"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}