{"id":5277,"date":"2015-10-14T16:39:42","date_gmt":"2015-10-14T11:09:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.itatonline.org\/info\/?p=5277"},"modified":"2015-10-14T16:39:42","modified_gmt":"2015-10-14T11:09:42","slug":"former-supreme-court-judge-levels-serious-allegation-of-corruption-against-chief-justice-of-india","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/former-supreme-court-judge-levels-serious-allegation-of-corruption-against-chief-justice-of-india\/","title":{"rendered":"Former Supreme Court Judge Levels Serious Allegation Of Corruption Against Chief Justice Of India"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Justice Markandey Katju, the former judge of the Supreme Court, has levelled grave allegations in his recent blog post and also given particulars of alleged incidents.<br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>In the past, Justice Katju has been in the news for the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.hindustantimes.com\/punjab\/50-of-higher-judiciary-corrupt-says-ex-sc-judge-markandey-katju\/story-Hfu8Ru8o9YfoGOjloboytN.html\" target=\"_blank\">allegation<\/a> that \u201c<em>50% of the higher judiciary has become corrupt<\/em>\u201d. He has also claimed that he had got a dossier on Chief Justice of India HL Dattu\u2019s alleged properties and given it to then law minister Ravi Shankar Prasad and others, but to no avail. \u201c<em>I was targeted by former chief justice RM Lodha for my views. Let it all be investigated. SC judges are annoyed. But I am not bothered\u2026,<\/em>\u201d Katju was reported to have said. <\/p>\n<p>The learned former Judge has also <a href=\"https:\/\/www.livelaw.in\/is-this-a-high-court-or-a-joke-justice-katjus-charges-against-allahabad-high-court\/\" target=\"_blank\">levelled allegations<\/a> against the Hon&#8217;ble Allahabad High Court (of which he was earlier acting Chief Justice) by asking whether &#8220;<em>It is a High Court or a Joke?<\/em>&#8221; At that stage also, a serious allegation was made that an adjourned matter does not come up for hearing unless a &#8220;<em>heavy bribe<\/em>&#8221; is paid to the concerned officials. <\/p>\n<p>There has been another outburst from the learned former judge today. The provocation for the outburst is the <a href=\"https:\/\/indianexpress.com\/article\/india\/india-news-india\/2002-gujarat-riots-sc-dismisses-ex-ips-officer-sanjiv-bhatts-petition-against-amit-shah\/\" target=\"_blank\">recent judgement<\/a> of the division bench of Chief Justice H L Dattu and Justice Arun Mishra in which the petition of Sanjiv Bhatt for constituting a special investigation team (SIT) and making BJP President Amit Shah and others parties to his petition. Justice Katju went to make the following allegation on twitter and in his <a href=\"https:\/\/justicekatju.blogspot.in\/2015\/10\/outrageous-verdict-what-other-verdict.html\" target=\"_blank\">blog<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-cards=\"hidden\" lang=\"en\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Dattu has built a palatial house in Bangalore which must be costing 50 crores. Where did he get the money for this? <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/BRQUaEpqoW\">pic.twitter.com\/BRQUaEpqoW<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Markandey Katju (@mkatju) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/mkatju\/status\/654203997457383424\">October 14, 2015<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Outrageous verdict<\/p>\n<p>What other verdict is to be expected from a bench presided over by that shameless man Dattu, who openly praised Modi, and against whom there are serious allegations of corruption?<\/p>\n<p> In fact long before he was appointed Chief Justice of India I sent to the then Union Law Minister, Mr. Ravi Shanker Prasad, a copy of a dossier (I still have a copy with me) containing prima facie documentary proof of his massive corruption (I also gave copies of the dossier to Mr. Shanti Bhushan, senior member of the Committee on Judicial Accountability, media representatives etc). These include photocopies of a large number of sale deeds of plots of land in Bangalore in the name of his wife Gayathri (who must be privy to his prima facie corruption) showing her name but as daughter of K.G. Guruvayya, instead of wife of Dattu, and as an agriculturist. Why did the lady conceal her marital status?<\/p>\n<p> Many of these plots were purchased in violation of the Karnatak Land Reforms Act.<\/p>\n<p>Dattu got himself allotted one plot in a scheme in which Karnatak High Court employees alone could get a plot. A high court judge is not an employee. He got another plot in a scheme whose bye laws say that a person who or whose wife has a plot in Bangalore cannot be allotted a plot. A large number of other illegal acquisitions of wealth are mentioned in the dossier.<\/p>\n<p> Dattu has built a palatial house in Bangalore on 1200 sq.m. land which must be costing 50 crores. Where did he get the money for this.<\/p>\n<p> I requested  all persons to whom I gave copies of the dossier that at least they should investigate the facts mentioned in the dossier, but nothing was done.<\/p>\n<p> My guess is that when Ravi Shankar Prasad, the then Union Law Minister received the dossier I sent him, he must have shown it to Modi and Arun Jaitley, and then they must have blackmailed Dattu by showing him the dossier, and telling him to do as they say, otherwise they will expose him. How else is one to explain Dattu&#8217;s effulgent praise of Modi openly? And how else is one to explain this latest outrageous judgment?<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The allegation was met with great shock and disbelief by Justice Katju\u2019s followers on twitter and facebook. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Justice Markandey Katju, the former judge of the Supreme Court, has levelled grave allegations in his recent blog post and also given particulars of alleged incidents<\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/former-supreme-court-judge-levels-serious-allegation-of-corruption-against-chief-justice-of-india\/\">Read more &#8250;<\/a><\/div>\n<p><!-- end of .read-more --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5277","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-all-information","category-supreme-courthigh-court-related"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5277","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5277"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5277\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5277"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5277"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5277"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}