{"id":5869,"date":"2015-11-30T11:44:56","date_gmt":"2015-11-30T06:14:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.itatonline.org\/info\/?p=5869"},"modified":"2015-11-30T11:44:56","modified_gmt":"2015-11-30T06:14:56","slug":"icai-objects-to-proposal-of-income-tax-dept-to-exclude-cas-from-practice-of-taxation-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/icai-objects-to-proposal-of-income-tax-dept-to-exclude-cas-from-practice-of-taxation-law\/","title":{"rendered":"ICAI Objects To Proposal Of Income-tax Dept To Exclude CAs From Practice Of Taxation Law"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The ICAI has addressed a letter dated 27.11.2015 to the Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, Chandigarh, raising objections to the alleged proposal of the department not to allow Chartered Accountants and non-Advocates to \u201c<em>practice law<\/em>\u201d in the course of proceedings before the tax authorities. The ICAI has pointed out that taxation is one of the \u201c<em>core-competence<\/em>\u201d areas of Chartered Accountants and that they have expertise in accounting, auditing and taxation. It is also pointed out that these subjects are dealt with in great depth in the CA curriculum and that the ICAI has dedicated committees on taxation. It is emphasized that a chartered accountant, on passing his final examination and completing his articled training, is an expert in taxation, accountancy, auditing, company law and other laws etc., and he is fully qualified to practice in these fields. The ICAI has also drawn attention to several legislation and judicial pronouncements to support its contention that CAs are qualified to practice taxation law and cannot be barred from the same. <\/p>\n<div class=\"journal2\">\n<a href=\"https:\/\/resource.cdn.icai.org\/40016legal281115pccrep.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Click here to download a pdf version of the letter from the ICAI website<\/a><\/div>\n<p><HR\/><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>27th   November, 2015 <\/p>\n<p>To,<br \/>\n  The  Principal Chief Commissioner<br \/>\n  Income  Tax,<br \/>\n  Chandigarh <\/p>\n<p><strong>Sub: Only enrolled Advocates are licensed to practice Law  in India- Not to allow Chartered Accountants\/ Non- Advocates for practice of  law in the course of proceedings before revenue authorities falling under the jurisdiction  of Principal Commissioner of Income Tax and Commission of Income Tax, <\/strong><strong>Amritsar<\/strong><strong>, Jammu etc.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Dear  Sir,<\/p>\n<p>Recently,  it has come to our knowledge that a proposal not allowing Chartered  Accountants\/ Non- Advocates for practice of law in the course of proceedings  before revenue authorities falling in your jurisdiction is under consideration.<\/p>\n<p>In  this regard, although, comments have not been called for from the Institute of  Chartered Accountants of India New Delhi, yet being the statutory body and  regulator as well, we wish to bring the following facts for your consideration.<\/p>\n<p>The  Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, is a statutory body established by  an Act of Parliament namely &lsquo;The Chartered Accountants Act, 1949&rsquo; for  regulating the profession of Chartered Accountants. We further, wish to inform you  that a significant majority of our membership is in the practice with a good deal  of specialisation in the traditional areas of direct\/ indirect taxes and in emergent  specialism <em>inter alia<\/em>,  in financial services, information technology, insurance sector, joint  ventures, mutual funds, exchange risk management, risk and assurance services,  environment \/ energy\/quality audits, investment counselling, corporate  structuring and foreign collaborations etc.<\/p>\n<p>The  Institute of Chartered Accountants of India is also engaged in the Nation  building by contributing to Central and various State Governments and other  regulators viz, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Trade Policy division of the  Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Reserve Bank of  India, Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority, Comptroller and Auditor  General of India, Securities Exchange Board of India etc. to name a few, on the  relevant matter of importance to the profession and having bearing to the public  interest.<\/p>\n<p>The  education and training programme of the Institute to the qualification of Chartered  Accountancy is adequately designed to ensure that our members have in depth  knowledge\/ experience of accounting, taxation, financing and audit etc. The Institute  spares no efforts in keeping pace with the current accounting and auditing  practices prevalent throughout the world. An individual who qualifies as a Chartered  Accountant has to mandatorily undergo rigorous practical training and has to  keep his knowledge updated in the matter relating to accountancy, audit, taxation  and corporate laws etc. The area of training covers accountancy, auditing, taxation,  company law and other laws. The level of knowledge prescribed in the various  subjects covered by the syllabus of the Chartered Accountancy course is &lsquo;expert  knowledge&rsquo;.<\/p>\n<p>That  Taxation including Indirect Taxes is one of the core-competence areas of  Chartered Accountants. In India,  Chartered Accountants have expertise in accounting, auditing and taxation,  since these subjects are dealt with in great depth in the CA curriculum. Further,  Taxation constitutes a significant area of practice of CAs. It is due to this  reason the Institute has three separate dedicated committees on taxation,  namely, Direct Taxes Committee, Indirect Taxes Committee and Committee on  International Taxation. These committees are amongst the most important  committees of the Institute and they act as a liaison between the Revenue and  the tax payers. The Committees comprise of chartered accountant members of the  Central Council, as well as other co-opted members, who are experts in the  field of Taxation from across the country. Therefore, it is clear that a  chartered accountant, on passing his final examination and completing his  articled training, is an expert in taxation, accountancy, auditing, company law  and other laws etc., and he is accordingly fully qualified to practice in these  fields.<\/p>\n<p>Chartered  Accountants are thus well trained in various laws which are applied while  conducting cases before various tribunals and other similar authorities. <\/p>\n<p>The  provisions of Income tax Act involve computation and analysis of profit and  loss account which directly relates to accounting procedure or the recording, presentation  or certification of financial facts or data. Chartered Accountants being an  expert in understanding and analyzing the financial statements are thus the right  person for explaining the related facts in case of dispute.<\/p>\n<p>For  application of tax legislations, the prima facie documents are financial statements  thus the government has given the task relating to financial statements appropriately  to Chartered Accountants.<br \/>\n  The  matters before the Tax Authorities involve issues and questions mainly relating  to accountancy and require knowledge and expertise in accounting matters. This  is why many of the leading and most successful tax advocates are also qualified  Chartered Accountants. The appearance of Chartered Accountants before tax  authorities and tribunals has always been considered to be an integral part of  the practice of a Chartered Accountancy ever since 1940s, when the Income Tax  Appellate Tribunal was first set up and when Chartered Accountants began appearing  before it.<\/p>\n<p>It  is necessary to note that the members of the Institute are thus well trained in  the fields of various laws which are applied while conducting the cases before  the various tax\/revenue authorities. It is in recognition of that crucial fact  the various applicable statutes specifically permit Chartered Accountants to  appear before authorities and Tribunals constituted under those statutes. A few  of such statutes are listed below:-<\/p>\n<p><em>(a) Section 288 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 read with  Rule 50 of the Income Tax Rules, 1962<\/em><br \/>\n    <em>(b) Section 35-Q of the Central Excise Act, 1944<\/em><br \/>\n    <em>(c) Section 146-A of the Customs Act, 1962 read with  Rule 9(a) of the Customs (Appeals) Rules, 1982<\/em><br \/>\n    <em>(d) Section 15-V of the Securities and Exchange Board  of <\/em><em>India<\/em><em> Act, 1992<\/em><br \/>\n    <em>(e) Section 22(C) of the Securities Contracts  (Regulation) Act, 1956<\/em><br \/>\n    <em>(f) Section 17 of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of <\/em><em>India<\/em><em> Act, 1991<\/em><br \/>\n    <em>(g) Section 432 of the Companies Act, 2013<\/em><br \/>\n    <em>(h) Regulation 19 of the Company Law Board Regulations,  1991<\/em><br \/>\n    <em>(i) Section 35 and Section 53 S of the Competition  (Amendment) Act, 2007<\/em><br \/>\n    <em>(j) Rule 61 of the Special Economic Zone Rules, 2006<\/em><br \/>\n    <em>(k) Before the Central Electricity Regulatory  Commission vide Notification No.8\/(1)\/99\/CERC dated 27.8.1999<\/em><br \/>\n    <em>(l) Airport Economic Regulatory Authority of <\/em><em>India<\/em><em> Act; in terms of section 30, CA can appear before  Appelate Tribunal<\/em><br \/>\n    <em>(m) The Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 &mdash; in  terms of Sections 16 and 32<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Needless  to mention that the Institute, since its inception in the year of 1949, has  always remained at the forefront in serving the nation by establishing sound  financial prudence within the country.<\/p>\n<p>Further,  the Institute has a stringent code of conduct\/Ethics which are required to be  followed by its members. It is also pertinent to mention that the Chartered  Accountants Act, 1949 provides the disciplinary mechanism for making investigation  and taking disciplinary action in respect of any complaint\/information of  professional\/other misconduct in respect of a member and\/or levy of penalty of  permanent removal of name from the register of members and\/or levy of penalty  up to Rupees Five Lakhs as well depending on the gravity of offence(s).  Therefore, the Chartered Accountants are governed by the Chartered Accountants  Act, 1949 and the Chartered Accountants Regulations 1988 framed there under and  are subject to strict provisions of professional ethics and professional  conduct and any deviation there from would make them liable for disciplinary  action under the said Act. The ICAI has established a Peer Review Board to  ensure compliance with technical standards, acceptance and adherence to quality  control policies and procedures by Chartered Accountants firm in the services  being rendered by them. Such reviews certainly boost the confidence of society  at large in the quality of work of Chartered Accountants in India.<\/p>\n<p>The  term &lsquo;practice of profession of law&rsquo; has not been defined under the Advocates  Act, 1961. The appearance before the Authorities established under the Income-Tax  Act does not amount to &lsquo;practice of profession of law&rsquo;. The Hon&rsquo;ble Supreme  Court in the case of <strong>C. Venkatachalam vs. Ajitkumar C.  Shah &amp; Ors. [6 (2011) 9 SCC 707]<\/strong>, while  considering the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, upheld the  judgment of the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court, whereby the Hon&rsquo;ble  High Court held that a party before the District Consumer Forum\/State  Commission cannot be compelled to engage the service of an advocate. The Hon&rsquo;ble  Supreme Court also observed that the High Court was fully justified in  observing that the authorized agents do not practice law when they are permitted  to appear before the District Forum and the State Commission. Further, the Hon&rsquo;ble  Supreme Court also approved the view taken by the High Court that many  statutes, such as, Value Added Tax, Income Tax and Competition Act also permit  non-advocates to represent the parties before the authorities and those non-advocates  cannot be said to be practicing law.<\/p>\n<p>A  perusal of Section 33 of the Advocates Act, 1961 shows that it specifically contemplates  and provides that the other statute in question may specifically permit persons  other than Advocates to appear before Courts and Tribunals functioning under  that statute. Such provisions are to be found in all Central as well as State  Acts dealing with various direct and indirect taxes such as Income Tax, Excise  Duty, Value Added tax, etc. The Hon&rsquo;ble Supreme Court in <strong>R.D. Nagpal v. Vijay Dutt [(2011) 12 SCC 498] <\/strong>considered  the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Rule 14(3) of the Consumer  Protection Rules, 1987 allowed the parties or their agents to appear before the  National Commission, and the expression &lsquo;agent&rsquo; as defined in Section 2(b) of  the said Act means a person duly authorised by a party to present any  complaint, appeal or reply on its behalf before the National Commission. The  Supreme Court held that given the wide definition of the expression &lsquo;agent&rsquo;,  there was no reason, if the Commission were otherwise satisfied that a person  was authorised on behalf of the appellant, to refuse to allow him to represent  it and to cross examine the complainant. The provisions of Section 33 of the  Advocates Act of 1961 came up for consideration and it was held as follows:-<\/p>\n<p><em>6. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the  respondents has relied upon Section 33 of the Advocates Act, 1961. Section 33  makes it clear that advocates alone will be entitled to practice before any  court or before any authority, etc. &ldquo;except as otherwise provided in this Act  or in any other law for the time being in force&rdquo;. The Consumer Protection Act  read with the Rules would be &ldquo;a law for the time being in force&rdquo;.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Recently,  the Lucknow Bench of the Hon&#8217;ble High Court of Judicature at Allahabad,  in case No. 7116 of 2014, Tax Lawyers Association, Lucknow Through General  Secry. &amp; Anr. vs. State of U.P. Thru  Prin. Secy. Tax &amp; Registration, has passed an Order dated 06.08.2014  directing, inter alia, that any person, who is not a registered Advocate, shall  not be permitted to appear before the Authority under the U.P. VAT Act.  Further, the Hon&rsquo;ble Bench of the Chief Justice of Lucknow Bench of the  Allahabad High Court, after hearing the arguments in detail on 20th August, 2014,  modified the above Order dated 6th   August, 2014 vacating the stay and consequently,  Chartered Accountants continue to be permitted to appear before the authorities  under the VAT Act in the State of U.P. The  Division Bench of the Hon&rsquo;ble Chief Justice&rsquo;s Court, in its Order dated 20.08.2014,  observed that Section 29 of the Advocates Act, 1961 speaks of there being only  one class of persons entitled to practice the profession of law, namely, advocates.  Section 33 of the said Act contemplates that only a person who is enrolled as  an advocate under the Act will be entitled to practice in any court or before  any authority or person. The entitlement to practice under Section 33 of the Advocates  Act, 1961 is obviously an entitlement to practice the profession of law but  what is more important is that Section 33 recognises that any other provision of  law and for that matter, the Act itself may authorize a person who is not  enrolled as an advocate under it to practice in any court or before any  authority or person.<\/p>\n<p>Consequently,  there is no question of the ultra vires doctrine being attracted for the simple  reason that Section 33 of the Act of 1961 contemplates that any other law may  authorize a person who is not enrolled as an advocate under the Act to practice  before any court, authority or person.<\/p>\n<p>It  is stated that the above matter is pending before the Lucknow Bench of the  Hon&#8217;ble High Court of Judicature at Allahabad  for final hearing. <\/p>\n<p>The  Statute only confers on lawyers the exclusive right to practice law. With the  passage of time there are a lot of functions which are overlapping with the practice  of law and such overlapping functions cannot confer the right on lawyers under  the Advocates Act. Any such interpretation will stultify the growth and evolution  of society and the rules of effective and expeditious dispute resolution. It is,  therefore, of vital importance to note that Section 33 of the Advocates Act,  1961 itself specifically contemplates and provides that the other statute in  question may specifically permit persons other than Advocates to appear before  Courts and Tribunals functioning under that statute. Such provisions are to be  found in all Central as well as State Acts dealing with various direct and  indirect taxes such as<br \/>\n  Income  tax, Excise duty, value added tax etc. Thus, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal  is constituted under the provisions of The Income Tax Act, 1961. Section 288 of  the Income Tax Act, 1961 provides for appearance by &lsquo;authorised representatives&rsquo;  before any Income-tax Authority or the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal.<\/p>\n<p>Moreover,  the matters before the various tax\/revenue authorities involving mainly issues  and questions relating to Accountancy and require knowledge and expertise in  accounting matters. Indeed, even if an advocate appears in such matters, he  cannot present his case in the most effective manner without a good knowledge  of accountancy. This is why many of the leading and most successful tax  advocates are also qualified Chartered Accountants. The appearance of Chartered  Accountants before tax authorities and tribunals has always been considered to  be an integral part of the practice of a Chartered Accountancy ever since  1940s. As stated above, the Institute spares no efforts in keeping pace with the  accounting practices prevalent and those evolving throughout the World. A person  who qualifies as a Chartered Accountant is to undergo rigorous practical training  spanning three years and has to keep his knowledge updated in the matters  relating to accountancy and the applicable laws. In any event, it is entirely for  the framers of the various enactments viz. Income Tax Act, 1961, the Companies  Act, 2013 etc. to lay down who should be eligible to appear before the Tribunals  and authorities constituted under each of these respective enactments.<\/p>\n<p>The  Income Tax Act and the provisions contained therein as to who can appear in proceedings  under those enactments are special provisions of law which would necessarily  prevail over the general provisions contained in the Advocates Act. <\/p>\n<p>Each  legislation enacted by Parliament or by a State Legislature is an independent  code by itself. Parliament and the State Legislature duly take into consideration  the various issues involved and incorporate the requirements into the respective  legislations. Therefore, to re-write such provisions so as to provide that the  appearance by other professionals is for a limited purpose only is totally unwarranted.<\/p>\n<p>That  law is a dynamic subject and the growth of trade and commerce and the  requirements of revenues of Governments have resulted in the emergence of specialized  legislations like the Income-tax Act, the Central Excise Act, 1944 and the  Customs Act, 1956 and other various State-Level VAT Legislations. The Constitution  of India itself has recognized the importance of the specialized fields of such  legislations and has expressly provided for the creation of specialized tribunals  which take care of such specialized fields of law. Parliament in its wisdom,  while enacting aforesaid legislations have considered all the relevant issues  before incorporating the provisions relating to authorized representatives. These  legislations specifically allowed professionals other than advocates to be authorized  representatives. This clearly amplifies the point that the legislature is fully  conscious of the requirements of the particular specialized legislation. The purpose  of establishing various Tribunals is to decide issue on a particular subject by  experts in that field and in that direction, specialized Tribunals have been created  by the various statutes. If the Chartered Accountants, who for reasons of rigorous  practical training and examinations, have acquired expertise in accounting and  taxation laws, were not to be allowed to appear before such specialized  authorities\/Tribunals, the very purpose of establishment of such Tribunals  would get defeated. Besides, such restrictions will limit the choice afforded  to the affected persons by the statutes to choose their representative.<\/p>\n<p>In  the matter of <strong><em>Rajkot<\/em><\/strong><strong><em> Engineering Association and Ors. And Tax Advocates  Association and Ors.v. Union of India <\/em><\/strong><strong><em>MANU<\/em><\/strong><strong><em>\/GJ\/0019\/1986 <\/em><\/strong>the  Gujarat High Court held as follows:<\/p>\n<p><em>&ldquo;There is no restriction on the right of the assessees  to select as their own authorised representatives whomever they like whether  the same chartered accountants who have carried out the tax audit or other chartered  accountants or other Income Tax practitioners&hellip;.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>In the present state of Income Tax law, the  interpretation and development of which has become very intricate and complex,  it is not difficult to anticipate that a situation has arisen where more and  more assessees would like to be assisted both by the chartered accountants as  well Income Tax consultants and practitioners who may be non-chartered accountants  in arranging their financial affairs and in the maintenance of their accounts,  records and documents for preparation of the returns and in the course of  assessment before tax authorities.&rdquo;<\/em><\/p>\n<p>In  the above backdrop we are of the view that it would not be appropriate to consider  any such proposal which restrains the Chartered Accountants from appearing  before the revenue authorities in India particularly when various Central\/State  legislations including the Income Tax Act, 1961 expressly provide and authorise  the Chartered Accountants to appear and represent the cases before the  authorities under the Income Tax Act, 1961. Further, we may request you to consider  our submissions as above and afford us an opportunity to present our case in  person before taking any final decision in this regard. In case your good office  needs any further clarifications, we may please be advised.<\/p>\n<p>Thanking  you,<br \/>\n  Yours  faithfully,<br \/>\n  (V. Sagar)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The ICAI has addressed a letter dated 27.11.2015 to the Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, Chandigarh, raising objections to the alleged proposal of the department not to allow Chartered Accountants and non-Advocates to \u201c<em>practice law<\/em>\u201d in the course of proceedings before the tax authorities. The ICAI has pointed out that taxation is one of the \u201c<em>core-competence<\/em>\u201d areas of Chartered Accountants and that they have expertise in accounting, auditing and taxation. It is also pointed out that these subjects are dealt with in great depth in the CA curriculum and that the ICAI has dedicated committees on taxation. It is emphasized that a chartered accountant, on passing his final examination and completing his articled training, is an expert in taxation, accountancy, auditing, company law and other laws etc., and he is fully qualified to practice in these fields. The ICAI has also drawn attention to several legislation and judicial pronouncements to support its contention that CAs are qualified to practice taxation law and cannot be barred from the same.<\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/icai-objects-to-proposal-of-income-tax-dept-to-exclude-cas-from-practice-of-taxation-law\/\">Read more &#8250;<\/a><\/div>\n<p><!-- end of .read-more --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1,7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5869","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-all-information","category-others"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5869","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5869"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5869\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5869"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5869"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5869"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}