{"id":6241,"date":"2015-12-30T11:57:04","date_gmt":"2015-12-30T06:27:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.itatonline.org\/info\/?p=6241"},"modified":"2015-12-30T12:00:39","modified_gmt":"2015-12-30T06:30:39","slug":"cbdt-frowns-on-hardship-to-taxpayers-and-wastage-of-time-by-issue-of-vague-s-1432-scrutiny-notices-by-ao","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/cbdt-frowns-on-hardship-to-taxpayers-and-wastage-of-time-by-issue-of-vague-s-1432-scrutiny-notices-by-ao\/","title":{"rendered":"CBDT Frowns On Hardship To Taxpayers And Wastage Of Time By Issue Of Vague S. 143(2) Scrutiny Notices By AO"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The CBDT has issued Instruction No. 19\/2015 dated 29.12.2015 stating that instances have come to the notice of the Board that in cases selected under scrutiny, while issuing the first notice, Assessing Officers do not convey the specific compliance requirements like production of accounts, furnishing of documents, information, evidences, submission of other requisite particulars etc. Since the taxpayers or their authorized representatives are required to comply with the statutory notice issued by the Assessing Officer, they remain clueless about the information required to be submitted and their appearance before the Assessing Officer does not serve any fruitful purpose except recording of their presence. This causes undue hardship to the taxpayers and unnecessary wastage of their time. The CBDT has directed that Assessing Officers should first go through the returns of income which have been selected for scrutiny and identify the issues which require examination. The initial notice issued under section 143(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 should itself be accompanied with the questionnaire containing details of specific documents\/information\/evidences etc. that are required to be furnished by the taxpayer in connection with scrutiny assessment proceeding in their respective case.<\/p>\n<div class=\"journal2\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.itatonline.org\/info\/index.php\/cbdt-frowns-on-hardship-to-taxpayers-and-wastage-of-time-by-issue-of-vague-s-1432-scrutiny-notices-by-ao\/cbdt-instruction-scrutiny-assmnts\/\"rel=\"attachment wp-att-6243\">Click here to download CBDT&#8217;s Instruction No. 19\/2015 dated 29.12.2015<\/a><\/div>\n<p><HR\/><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Instruction No. 19\/2015<\/p>\n<p>Government of India<br \/>\nMinistry of Finance<br \/>\nDepartment of Revenue<br \/>\nCentral Board of Direct Taxes<br \/>\nNorth Block, New Delhi, dated the 29th of December, 2015<\/p>\n<p>To<\/p>\n<p>All Pr. Chief-Commissioners of Income-tax\/Chief-Commissioners of Income-tax All Pr. Directors-General of Income-tax\/Directors-General  of Income-tax<\/p>\n<p>Subject- Issuing Questionnaire in cases selected for scrutiny- regarding<\/p>\n<p>Sir\/Madam<\/p>\n<p>Instances have come to the notice of the Board that in cases selected under scrutiny, while issuing the first notice, Assessing Officers do not convey the specific compliance requirements like production of accounts, furnishing of documents, information, evidences, submission of other requisite particulars etc. Since the taxpayers or their authorized representatives are required to comply with the statutory notice issued by the Assessing Officer, they remain clueless about the information required to be submitted and their appearance before the Assessing Officer does not serve any fruitful purpose except recording of their presence. This causes undue hardship to the taxpayers and unnecessary wastage of their time.<\/p>\n<p>2. Since the CASS cycles are proposed to be run well in advance now, sufficient time shall be available with the Assessing Officers to go through the returns of income which have been selected for scrutiny and identify the issues which require examination. Therefore,  in  cases  selected for scrutiny, it should be the endeavour of the Assessing Officer that the initial notice  issued  under section 143(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is accompany a notice under section  142(1) along with the  questionnaire  containing  details  of  specific  documents\/information\/evidences etc. that are required to be furnished  by  the  taxpayer in  connection  with  scrutiny  assessment  proceeding  in their respective case.<\/p>\n<p>3. All the Assessing Officers are required to comply with the above directions.<\/p>\n<p>4. Hindi version to follow.<\/p>\n<p>(Ankita Pandey) <\/p>\n<p>Under Secretary to Government of India<br \/>\n(F.No. 225\/328\/2015-ITA-II)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The CBDT has issued Instruction No. 19\/2015 dated 29.12.2015 stating that instances have come to the notice of the Board that in cases selected under scrutiny, while issuing the first notice, Assessing Officers do not convey the specific compliance requirements like production of accounts, furnishing of documents, information, evidences, submission of other requisite particulars etc. Since the taxpayers or their authorized representatives are required to comply with the statutory notice issued by the Assessing Officer, they remain clueless about the information required to be submitted and their appearance before the Assessing Officer does not serve any fruitful purpose except recording of their presence. This causes undue hardship to the taxpayers and unnecessary wastage of their time. The CBDT has directed that Assessing Officers should first go through the returns of income which have been selected for scrutiny and identify the issues which require examination. The initial notice issued under section 143(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 should itself be accompanied with the questionnaire containing details of specific documents\/information\/evidences etc. that are required to be furnished by the taxpayer in connection with scrutiny assessment proceeding in their respective case.<\/p>\n<div class=\"read-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/cbdt-frowns-on-hardship-to-taxpayers-and-wastage-of-time-by-issue-of-vague-s-1432-scrutiny-notices-by-ao\/\">Read more &#8250;<\/a><\/div>\n<p><!-- end of .read-more --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6241","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-all-information"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6241","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6241"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6241\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6241"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6241"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/info\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6241"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}