Month: February 2019

Archive for February, 2019


CIT v. R.R. Industries Ltd. (2019) 410 ITR 3 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 80IA : Industrial undertakings–Infrastructure development-
Operation of Industrial Park approved by competent Authority—Entitle to deduction.

Kohinoor Enterprises v. ACIT (2019) 410 ITR 153/ 175 DTR 43 / 307 CTR 154 (J&K) (HC)

S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure – Addition was made in prior year – Addition cannot be made relevant year.

V. R. Sreekumar v. CIT (2019) 410 ITR 1 (Ker) (HC)

S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Investment was not satisfactorily explained – Addition is held to be proper. [S. 69A]

Kohinoor Enterprises v. ACIT (2019) 410 ITR 153/ 175 DTR 43 / 307 CTR 154 (J&K) (HC)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Amount outstanding for six years—Addition cannot be made for the relevant accounting year.

Pawan Kumar Garg. v. CIT (2019) 410 ITR 131 (P&H) (HC)

S. 68 : Cash credits—loan from wife-Cash was deposited on the same day that cheque for that amount was issued- Addition is held to be justified.

Narendra Kumar Sakaria v. ACIT (2019) 410 ITR 43/ 261 Taxman 513 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 68 : Cash credits — Gifts —Overseas transactions through Bank conclusive proof- Credit worthiness of donor is required to be proved.

South Indian Bank Ltd. v. CIT (2019) 410 ITR 50 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 36(1)(viia) : Bad debt-Provision for bad and doubtful debts – Schedule bank-Allowable only to the extent statutorily prescribed.

J. B. Enterprise v. ACIT (2019) 410 ITR 138/ 175 DTR 171/ 307 CTR 415 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 10B : Export oriented undertakings–Manufacture-Cutting and polishing of diamonds amounts to manufacture—Entitled to exemption.

CIT v. A. P. Export. (2019) 410 ITR 168/ 175 DTR 66 / 307 CTR 550(Cal) (HC)

S. 10B : Export oriented undertakings–Manufacture- Purchase of semi-finished garments and making them export worthy-Constitute manufacture – Entitle to exemption.

Board of Control for Cricket In India. v. ACIT (2019) 174 ITD 355 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 272A : Penalty – Delay in filing quarterly TDS returns- Tax deducted was deposited in time – Filing of TDS return was delayed in initial years of switch-over from manual system in a e-filing of quarterly TDS returns due to several technical glitches in working of revenue’s server- Levy of penalty is held to be not justified .[ S. 272A(2) (K),273B ]