Category: Tax Laws

Archive for the ‘Tax Laws’ Category


Nilima Avinash Pradhan. (Mrs.) v. ITO (2024) 207 ITD 109 (Mum) (Trib.)

S. 54 : Capital gains-Profit on sale of property used for residence-Incomplete investment-Matter is remanded back to Assessing Officer for de novo adjudication.

Neelam Ajit Phatarpekar (Mrs.) v. ACIT [2024] 163 taxmann.com 335 (Bom)( HC)

Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020

S. 3:Amount payable by declarant – Time and manner of payment – Determined tax payable within 15 days of receipt of Form -3 – Requirement of paying an additional amount was informed to assessee only by communication dated 1-4-2022, long after extended date of 31-10-2021- Assessee should not have been denied benefits under DTVSV Act. [ S. 5 , Form No1 , Form No 3, Form No 4, Art. 226 [

Centre For Policy Research v. Dy. CIT (2024) 300 Taxman 66 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Pendency of appeal before CIT(A)-Failure to deposit 20 per cent of outstanding demand-Application for stay of demand could be considered without a 20 per cent pre deposit, matter required to be remitted to Assessing Officer for considering stay application bearing in mind legal principles-Matter remanded. [S. 250, Art. 226]

PCIT v. Pragati Pre Fab India Pvt. Ltd. (2024)467 ITR 167 /300 Taxman 358 (SC) Editorial : Pragati Pre Fab India (P.) Ltd. v. PCIT (2023) 295 Taxman 269 / (2024)460 ITR 387 / 337 CTR 862 (Bom.) (HC)

Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 .

S. 9 : Act not to apply in certain cases – Tax arrear-Prosecution has been instituted on or before the date of filing of declaration – Prosecution has to be in respect of tax arrear which is relatable to an assessment year – Directed the authorities to decide the declaration in conformity with the DTVSV Act- SLP of Revenue is dismissed . [S. 2(1)(o), 9(a) (ii), S. 276C(2), 278B, Art. 226]

Satish Kumar Dhingra v. Dy. CIT (2024)467 ITR 574 (Delhi)(HC)

Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 .

S.4:Filing of declaration and particulars to be furnished Rectification of order — Allegation of false declaration- Determination of tax attained finality- Once certificate is issued by Designated Authority — Rectification notice is barred by limitation .[ S. 3, 4(6), 5 , ITAct , 154 , Art. 226, Form No 5 ]

Puneet Sabharwal v. CBI (2024) 299 Taxman 1 / 466 ITR 314 (SC)

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
S. 13: Criminal misconduct by a public servant-A Government Servant-Prevention of corruption-Criminal misconduct-Offences and prosecution-Discharge of accused-Special bearer bonds-Unexplained investments-Assets acquired in the name of son-Trust-Separate entity-Proceedings under Income Tax Act which were sought to be relied upon were related to assessment of income of assessee and not related to source of income and allegation of disproportionate assets under Prevention of Corruption Act, thus, said orders could not be basis to abort criminal proceeding-Trial court is directed to complete the trial expeditiously. The Court is only required to consider judicially whether the material warrants the framing of charge without blindly accepting the decision of the prosecution. Appeal is dismissed. The Trial court is directed to complete the trial expeditiously [S. 13(1)(c), 13(2) IT Act, 1961,S 69, 254(1) Art. 136]

Unnamalai Thiagarajan v. CIT (Appeals) (2024) 299 Taxman 495 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 4 : Scope of total undisclosed foreign income and assets-Notice-Sought 45 days to provide bank statements from a closed DBS Bank account-Request is held to be reasonable-High Court directed the CIT(A) to consider request of assessee. [S. 250, Art. 226]

ACWT v. J. Jayalalitha (2024) 298 Taxman 5 /337 CTR 379(SC) Editorial: J.Jayalalitha v. ACWT (2011) 337 ITR 1/ (2012) 20 taxmann.com 736 (Mad)( HC)

Wealth -tax Act , 1957

S.35B: Failure to furnish returns of net wealth-Mechanical approval – High Court quashed the proceedings – Death of assessee – Criminal appeal abated Non-filing of return is not a continuing offence – Court held that since sole assessee had died and she had been discharged, criminal appeal stood abated and disposed of . [ Art. 136 ]

Dun & Bradstreet Technologies & Data Services (P.) Ltd v.PCIT (2024) 297 Taxman 323 (Mad)(HC)

S. 264 : Commissioner-Revision of other orders-concessional rate of tax on dividend distributed to its foreign holding company-Not justified in rejecting revision application on ground that assessee could have filed a revised return or an appeal under section 248-DTAA-India-Mauritius-Matter remanded to decide on merit. [S. 9(1)(i), 90, 139(5), 195, 248, art. 10(2),Art.226]

CIT (E) v. Gangadeen Niranjan Lal Data Charitable Trust (2024) 297 Taxman 294/463 ITR 695 (SC) Editorial : CIT (E) v. Gangadeen Niranjan Lal Data Charitable Trust (2024) 159 taxmann.com 207 / 463 ITR 690 (Raj)(HC)

S. 80G : Donation-No specific time frame mandated for carrying out charitable activities under section 800G(vi) of the Act-Order of Tribunal directing the Commissioner to grant approval is affirmed by High Court-SLP of Revenue is dismissed.[S. 80G(vi), Art.136]