S. 271(1)(c): Penalty-Concealment-Furnishing inaccurate particulars-Defective notice-Mere disallowance of claim not sufficient-Penalty deleted.[S. 147, 148, 274]
Pradeep Garg v. ITO (2025) 126 ITR 91 / 175 taxmann.com 44 (Jaipur)(Trib.)S. 271(1)(c): Penalty-Concealment-Furnishing inaccurate particulars-Defective notice-Mere disallowance of claim not sufficient-Penalty deleted.[S. 147, 148, 274]
Pradeep Garg v. ITO (2025) 126 ITR 91 / 175 taxmann.com 44 (Jaipur)(Trib.)S. 271(1)(c): Penalty-Concealment-Licence fee-Interest on delayed payment-Capital or revenue expenditure-Bona fide claim-Penalty not leviable. [S. 35ABB]
Asst. CIT v. Vodafone West Ltd (2025) 126 ITR 335 / 173 taxmann.com 585 (Delhi)(Trib.) ACIT v. Vodafone Idea Ltd. (2025) 126 ITR 335 / 173 taxmann.com 585 (Delhi)(Trib.)S. 270A: Penalty-Under-reporting or misreporting of income-Notice not specifying exact charge-Penalty invalid-Employees’ contribution to Provident Fund and ESI-Issue debatable at relevant time-Penalty not leviable-Ad hoc disallowance of expenditure-Estimated addition-Penalty not leviable.[S.270A(2)(a), 270A(9)]
Mideast Integrated Steels Ltd. v. Asst. CIT (2025) 126 ITR 653 (Delhi)(Trib.)S. 263: Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Weighted deduction for scientific research-Assessee furnished all requisite particulars-Revision not justified.
[S. 35(2AB), 143(3), R. 6]
S. 254 (1): Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Delay of 1,566 days-Wrong legal advice-Delay condoned.[S. 253]
Ajay Parasmal Kothari v. ITO [2024] 159 taxmann.com 570 / (2025) 126 ITR 511 (Mum.)(Trib.)S. 154: Rectification of mistake-Mistake apparent from the record-Employees’ contribution to Provident Fund and ESI-Deposit beyond due date under respective Acts-Disallowance upheld.
[S.36(1)(va) 43B, 139(1), 154]
S. 153D: Assessment-Search-Approval-Mechanical and omnibus approval for seven assessment years-Assessment quashed.[S.153A]
Inder Chand Bajaj v. Dy. CIT (2025) 126 ITR 500 (Delhi)(Trib.)S. 153D: Assessment-Search-Approval-Quasi-judicial function-Mechanical approval without application of mind-Assessment quashed.[S. 153A]
S. P. Singla Constructions (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 126 ITR 536 (Chd.)(Trib.)S. 153D: Assessment-Search-Approval-Composite approval for seven assessment years-No independent application of mind-Assessment quashed.[S.153A]
Kehar Singh v. Dy. CIT (2025) 126 ITR 609 (Delhi)(Trib.)S. 153D: Assessment-Search-Approval-Consolidated approval for seven assessment years-Mechanical approval-Assessment quashed.[S.153A]
Apple Commodities Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2025) 126 ITR 623 / 179 taxmann.com 552 (Delhi)(Trib.)