Month: February 2019

Archive for February, 2019


ACIT v. Dhruv Khaitan ( Mum) (Trib) (UR) ACIT v. Archana Kahitan ( Mrs ) ( Mum) (Trib) (UR )

S. 49 : Capital gains – Previous owner – Cost of acquisition – Shares received on dissolution of Trust – Period of holding of the previous owner i.e. the Trust to be considered -Sale consideration received on sale of shares has to be assessed as long term capital gains [S. 45, 49(1)(iii)(b), 54F, 68 ]

CIT v. Global Tele-Systems Ltd ( 2019) 183 DTR 381( Bom) (HC)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure- Capital or revenue -Purchase of software- Held to be revenue expenditure.

Himalayan Educational Trust v. DCIT (E) (2019) 174 ITD 493 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 272A : Penalty-Failure to file return with in prescribed time period -Penalty provision will attract automatically irrespective income determined in the course of assessment. [S.139(4A), 272(2)(e), 275(1)]

Pankaj Wadhwa v. ITO (2019) 174 ITD 479 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Two house properties – Annual value -Deemed let out- All relevant facts were brought on record at time of assessment–Reassessment is bad in law. [S. 22, 23(1), 148]

Dhruv Sachdeva v. ACIT (2019) 174 ITD 504 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 145 : Method of accounting-Cash system-Tax deduction at source-Mismatch of professional receipts appearing in form no 26AS-Credit for tax deduction at source was claimed-Corresponding professional receipts cannot be assessed to tax if such receipts were otherwise not assessable as income for the relevant year. [S. 194A, 194J, 199 R.37BA, form 26AS]

K.S. Cold Storage v. ACIT (2019) 174 ITD 485 /175 DTR 433/ 198 TTJ 905(Pune) (Trib.)

S. 143(2) : Assessment–Service of notice to manager is a valid service as the assessee has appeared before the Assessing Officer without taking any objection. [S. 292BB]

Premier Industries (India) Ltd. v. JCIT (2019) 174 ITD 415 (Indore)(Trib.)

S. 73 : Losses in speculation business – Business of manufacturing and trading of soya premier nutrition and dairy products- Hedging of forward trading – No specific details shown by the assessee to demonstrate that to guard against loss through price fluctuation which might arise from contracts for delivery of goods- loss from alleged contracts did not fall under proviso (a) of section 43(5) of the Act. [ S.43(5)]

Kumar Pappu Singh v. DCIT (2019) 174 ITD 465 / 175 DTR 198 (Visakha) (Trib.)

S. 56 : Income from other sources -Share holder -Close relatives -Transactions between close relatives provisions of S 56(2) (vii)(c) is not applicable-Revision on the basis of audit objection is held to be not valid [S. 56 (2) (vii)(c), 263]

ACIT v. Ishita Mohatta (Mrs.) (2019) 174 ITD 407 (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 54F : Capital gains – Investment in a residential house – Though new asset purchased within prescribed period had been let out would still be entitled to claim deduction. [S. 45]

Anil Murlidhar Deshmukh v. ITO (2019) 174 ITD 377 (SMC) (Pune)(Trib.)

S. 50C : Capital gains – Full value of consideration – Stamp valuation-Valuation of property submitted by the Assessee was rejected and referred the matter to DV0-Value adopted by the DVO is binding on the Assessing Officer. [S. 45]