Month: April 2019

Archive for April, 2019


PCIT v. Bank Note Paper Mill India (P.) Ltd. (2018) 256 Taxman 429 /( 2019) 412 ITR 415 (Karn ) ( HC)

S. 260A : Appeal – High Court – Strictures -The Court deprecated the tendency of the Revenue to file appeals even though the issues were ex facie covered by the decisions of the jurisdictional High Courts or even the Supreme Court of India – Copy of order is forwarded to Chief Commissioner , CBDT , Mimistry of Finance , Department of revenue for need ful action – Interest income- Held to be not assessable .[ S.4 ]

Inspectorate Singapore Pte. Ltd. (2018) 194 TTJ 53 (UO) (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty–Concealment–Quantum addition was not challenged – Receipts were not offered to tax in the return-Levy of penalty is held to be not justified.

Heritage Marketing v. ITO (2018) 171 DTR 402 / 196 TTJ 379 (Chd.)(Trib.)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty–Concealment–Difference in TDS- Agreed addition- levy of penalty is held to be not valid.

Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. v. ACIT (2018) 191 TTJ 148 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 234B : Interest-Advance tax–Interest is to be computed with respect to total income determined in regular assessment as per definition of assessed tax given in S. 234B of the Act- Matter remanded.[S. 140A]

Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. v. ACIT (2018) 191 TTJ 148 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 145A : Method of accounting–Valuation–Advance Custom duty paid adjusted against excise duty payable–Allowable as deduction- Directed the AO to recast profit and loss account under inclusive method. [S. 43B]

Dy.CIT v. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India (P) Ltd. (2018) 193 TTJ 65 (UO) (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Professional income–Year of taxability- Income offered in subsequent year–No loss to revenue–Deletion of addition is held to be justified.[S. 4]

Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. v. ACIT (2018) 191 TTJ 148 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Alleged excess consumption-Addition is held to be not justified.

Jaipur Rugs Co. P. Ltd. v. DCIT (2018) 64 ITR 128 / 193 TTJ 49 (UO)(Jaipur)(Trib.)

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Validity-Draft order wrongly titled as assessment order–Objection was not raised before DRP-Validity of assessment cannot be challenged. [S. 92CA, 144C]

ACIT v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. (2018) 67 ITR 191 /195 TTJ 65 (UO) (Chennai) (Trib.)

S. 115WB : Fringe benefits–Salary–Contribution to approved super annuation fund–Disallowance is held to be justified. [S. 15]

ACIT v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. (2018) 67 ITR 191 /195 TTJ 65 (UO) (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 115JB : Book profit– Not applicable to insurance companies.