Year: 2019

Archive for 2019


Innovative Infrastructure (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2019) 176 ITD 868 / 182 DTR 20 (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 32 : Depreciation-Transit mixer mounted on vehicle eligible for higher rate of depreciation-Trucks on which said RMC was mounted for transporting it to construction site –Not eligible for higher depreciation. [S. 32(1)(iia)]

Bangalore Development Authority v. ACIT (2019) 176 ITD 833/ 201 TTJ 132 /( 2020 ) 191 DTR 325 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Relief for poor does not necessarily mean giving something free of cost to poor and it also includes providing them things at a concessional rate-Social objective of providing plots and sites to economically weaker section of society at affordable and reasonable rates-Held to be charitable purpose–Entitle to exemption. [S. 2(15)]

Opinder Singh Virk Pravesh Kumar Sharma. v. ITO (2019) 176 ITD 863 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 10(37) : Capital gains – Agricultural land – Interest received on enhanced compensation-Entitle to exemption. [S.45(5), Land Acquisition Act, S. 28]

Credit Suisse AG v. DCIT (IT) (2019) 176 ITD 873 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 9(1)(vii) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Fees for technical services-Dubai based branch a foreign bank, received referral charges from its Indian Branch for referring a resident client to Indian branch for bringing out issue of convertible bonds- Not liable to tax in India as fee for technical services- Transaction with head office-Interest paid- Neither deductible nor chargeable – DTAA-India- Switzerland. [S. 9(1)(i), Art. 7, 12]

ULO Systems LLC v. DCIT IT (2019) 176 ITD 805/ 200 TTJ 321 / 179 DTR 97(Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 9(1)(i) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Business connection – Income from grouting to be taxable income arising out of a Fixed Place Permanent establishment-DTAA-India–UAE. [Art. 5]

Royal Western India Turf Club Ltd. v. ACIT( 2019) 201 TTJ 871 /178 ITD 18 / 73 ITR 670 / 184 DTR 393(Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 194B : Deduction at source-Winning from lottery-Cross word puzzle -stake money–Money paid to horse owners for winning races The position of TDS on ‘stake money’ has not changed even after amendment in S. 194B of the Act by Finance Act, 2001 and the position prior to amendment continues to prevail, i.e. stake money is not liable to deduct tax at source either under S.194BB or under S.194B of the Act-Recipients have shown the income received from the assessee and paid the taxes-Assessee cannot be treated as an assessee in default–Interest levied is set aside. [S. 194BB, 201(1), 201(IA)].

CC(Prevention) v. Advance Technology Devices ( 2019) 26 G.S.T.L.18 ( Bom) (HC)

S. 260A : Appeal – High Court -Restoration of appeal -Delay of 2386 days- Appeal not to be dismissed only on the ground of failure to get numbered / registered – Delay being technical in nature condoned and appeal restored. [ Bombay High Court ( Original side ) Rules 986, Customs Act .]

System India Casting v. PCIT ( 2019) 310 CTR 26/ 180 DTR 317 (Chhattisgarh)(HC),www.itatonline.org

S. 276C : Offences and prosecutions – Wilful attempt to evade tax-Concealment penalty is deleted –Quashing of prosecution is automatic- The High Court can exercise its inherent jurisdiction to quash the prosecution and not indulge in the empty formality of directing the assessee to approach the Trial Magistrate .[ S.271(1)( c ),, 277 278 , Art , 226 , 227 ]

Dy. CIT v. Setu Securities Pvt. Ltd. (Mum.)(Trib.)(UR)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Client code modifications (CCM)–Recorded reasons being vague merely on the basis of information received from the office of DIT (Intell CR Inv.) reassessment is held to be bad in law. [S. 148]

DCIT v. Asian Paints PPG Pvt. Ltd. (Mum.)(Trib.)(UR)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure–Capital or revenue–Royalty paid for license to use is held to be revenue expenditure.