Year: 2019

Archive for 2019


Golden Gate Properties Ltd. v. DCIT( 2019) 179 DTR 241/ 310 CTR 351 (Karn)(HC),www.itatonline.org

S. 276B : Offences and prosecutions – Failure to pay to the credit tax deducted at source -Mere delay in depositing TDS within the time limit prescribed in S. 200 & Rule 30 is an offense sufficient to attract S. 276B. The fact that the TDS has been deposited subsequently does not absolve the offense. The fact that penalty u/s 221 has not been levied is not relevant because there is an admitted delay in depositing TDS. [S. 200, 221, R.30]

Nokia Solutions and Networks Italia Spa v. DDIT (Delhi)(HC), www.itatonline.org

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Duties-Directions-ITAT should take appropriate steps and expedite hearing in old appeals.

Swastic Safe Deposit and Investment Ltd. v. ACIT ( 2019)265 Taxman 164/(2020) 312 CTR 389/ 185 DTR 156 (Bom.)(HC), www.itatonline.orgEdditorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed ACIT v. Swastik Safe Deposit and Investments Ltd ( 2020) 118 taxmann.com 94/ 273 Taxman 89 (SC)

S. 147 : Reassessment –Non disclosure of receipt- Capital gains- Sale of shares- Long term – STT paid -The attempt of further verification would amount to rowing inquiry- Reassessment is bad in law. [S 2(29A, 10(38) ,115JB, .143(1), 148]

Anil kisanlal Marda v. ITO ( 2019) 177 ITD 749 /182 DTR 153 / 201 TTJ 100(Pune)(Trib.), www.itatonline.org

S. 143(2) : Assessment-Notice-If a notice is issued but is returned unserved by the postal authorities and thereafter no effort is made to serve another notice before the deadline, it shall be deemed to be a case of “non-service” and the assessment order will have to be quashed. [ [S.292BB, R.127, General Clauses Act, 1897, S. 27 ]

ACIT v. Netafim Irrigation India Pvt. Ltd. ( 2020) 185 DTR 30(Mum.)(Trib.), www.itatonline.org

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-cannot determine The ALP at nil on an ad-hoc basis-If an authority like the RBI or Commerce Ministry has approved the rate of royalty, it carries persuasive value that the rate is at ALP.

Deepak Nagar v. DCIT (Delhi)(Trib.), www.itatonline.org

S. 68 : Cash credits-Bogus capital gains from penny stocks-Mere allegation is not sufficient–No action from SBI–Capital gains cannot be assessed as cash credits. [S. 45]

PCIT v. Binod Kumar Singh ( 2019) 178 DTR 49 / 264 Taxman 335/ 310 CTR 243 /( 2020) 423 ITR 175 (Bom.)(HC), www.itatonline.org

S. 68 : Cash credits–Non–Resident–I Not an ordinary resident -if the assessee is non–resident amount found deposited in a foreign bank is not taxable in India either u/s 68 or u/s 69 of the Act. Period of 182 days to be considered for calculating residential status of a person migrated to Foreign Country [S. 6(6), 69]

Cinestaan Entertainment P. Ltd. v. ITO ( 2019) 200 TTJ 459/ 180 DTR 65/ 177 ITD 809 (Delhi)(Trib.), www.itatonline.orgEditorial , Affirmed in PCIT v. Cinestaan Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 433 ITR 82/ 199 DTR 345/ 320 CTR 381 (Delhi) (HC)

S. 56 : Income from other sources–Valuation-start-up-Assessee has the option under Rule 11UA(2) to determine the FMV by either the ‘DCF Method’ or the ‘NAV Method’-The AO has no jurisdiction to tinker with the valuation and to substitute his own value or to reject the valuation. [S. 56(2)(viib),,R.11UA(2)]

Snowtex Investment Ltd. v. PCIT (SC)(2019) 414 ITR 227/ 265 Taxman 3 / 308 CTR 665/ 178 DTR 89 (SC), www.itatonline.org.Editorial: Judgment from , PCIT v. Snowtex Investment Ltd ( 2017) 87 taxmann.com 356 ( Cal) (HC)

S. 43(5) : Speculative transaction-Non–banking financial company- Trading in shares and securities-Loss incurred as a result of trading in shares–cannot be set off against the business of futures and options as it did not constitute profits and gains of a speculative business. Statement by assessee before Assessing Officer that share trading was its sole business during the year – Bond by admission – Interpretation- Intention of legislature to be seen . [S. 73, 143 (3( ]

PCIT v. State Bank of India ( 2019) 181 DTR 275 / ( 2020) 420 ITR 376/314 CTR 542 (Bom.)(HC), www.itatonline.org

S. 40A(9) : Expenses or payments not deductible-Contributions to unapproved and unrecognized funds–Held to be allowable if they are genuine in nature. [ S.36(1) (iv), 36(1)(iva) 36(1)(v) ]