Year: 2019

Archive for 2019


India Today Online Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2019) 176 ITD 459/ 178 DTR 17/ 199 TTJ 681(Delhi)(Trib),www.itatonline.org

S. 56 : Income from other sources – Fair Market Value-DCF method –Closely held company – The fact that the company is loss-making does not mean that shares cannot be allotted at premium. The DCF method is a recognised method though it is not an exact science & can never be done with arithmetic precision. The fact that future projections of various factors made by applying hindsight view cannot be matched with actual performance does not mean that the DCF method is not correct. [ S. 56(2)(viib), Rule 11UA. ]

Lovy Ranka v. DCIT ( 2019) 177 DTR 273/199 TTJ 670(Ahd)(Trib), www.itatonline.org

S. 50C : Capital gains-Full value of consideration- Stamp valuation- AO is obliged to compute the capital gains by taking the valuation arrived at by the DVO in place of the actual consideration received by the assessee -The assessee is entitled to challenge the correctness of the DVO’s valuation before the CIT(A) and the Tribunal- The DVO has to be given an opportunity of hearing. [ S.45 ]

Swati Pawa (Ms.) v. DCIT (2019) 175 ITD 622 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 251 : Appeal – Commissioner (Appeals) – Powers – CIT(A) is not empowered to dismiss appeal for non-prosecution and is obliged to dispose of appeal on merits by passing a speaking order. [S. 250]

Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. v. ITO(TDS) (2019) 70 ITR 352 / 175 ITD 504/ 198 TTJ 470/ 175 DTR 313/199 TTJ 377/ 177 DTR 256(Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 201 : Deduction at source-Failure to deduct or pay–Bonafide belief that as employees of State Government and were entitled to exemption of entire sum of unutilised leave encashment–Failure to deduct tax at source–Cannot be treated as assessee in default .[S.10(10AA(ii), 192, 201(1), 201(IA)]

Zuberi Engineering Company V. DCIT (2019) 69 ITR 261 / 175 ITD 557 / 197 TTJ 659 / 179 DTR 25(Jaipur)(Trib.)

S. 145 : Method of accounting-Low gross profit–Books of account cannot be rejected without pointing out any defects CIT(A) cannot enhance and reject the books of account which was not the subject matter of assessment. [S. 251]

ITO v. Toms Enterprises. (2019) 175 ITD 607/199 TTJ 758/ 180 DTR 235 (Cochin)(Trib.)

S. 133A : Power of survey -Sworn statement–Addition cannot be made only on the basis of statement of managing director recorded u/s. 131 during survey, without any corroborative evidence. [S. 131, 132(4) ,143(3), Evidence Act, 1878, S. 18]

James P. D’Silva. v. DCIT (2019) 175 ITD 533/199 TTJ 739 / 179 DTR 281(Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 68 : Cash credits–Advance received in earlier years-Addition cannot be made as cash credits.

Murtuza Shabbir Jamnagarwala v. ITO (2019) 175 ITD 494 (Pune) (Trib.)

S. 54B : Capital gains–Agricultural land-Land was used for agricultural purposes–Land classified as agricultural land Jowar crop was grown- Eligible exemption [S.2(14), 45]

AIG Offshore Systems Services Inc. v. ACIT (2019) 175 ITD 647/ 197 TTJ 765 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 48 : Capital gains–Computation-Foreign Institutional Investor (FII)-Sale of shares of Indian subsidiary-legal/professional fees paid to lawyers/accounting firms- Allowable as deduction. [S.45, 48(1)]

Richa Bagrodia v. DCIT (2019) 175 ITD 552 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 45 : Capital gains- Long term–Short term- Sale of flat – Date of allotment of flat and not date of giving possession of flat which has to be considered as date for computing holding period of 36 months. [S. 2(29A)]