Year: 2019

Archive for 2019


Global Academy of Emergency Medicine v. CIT( 2018) 196 TTJ 273 / 171 DTR 73/(2019) 175 ITD 96 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 12AA : Procedure for registration –Trust or institution- Registration cannot be refused on the ground that all initial trustees had taken citizenship of foreign country – Order of CIT(E) rejection of registration and application u/s 80G is set aside .[S.80G ,FEMA , 1999, S.6(5), Indian Trust Act 1882 , S 10,.60, 73 ]

India Pistons Ltd. v. (2018) 169 DTR 113 / 195 TTJ 358 (Chennai)( Trib)

S. 271AA : Penalty – Failure to keep and maintain books of accounts –Documents – International transaction – Transfer pricing – failure to maintain books of account as per rule 10D and failure to furnish documents u/s 92D(1) –No reasonable cause – Liable to penalty [S. 92D, 271G, 273B, Rule 10D]

Hindustan Aqua Ltd. v. ACIT (2018) 195 TTJ 76 (Delhi) (Trib) Moon Beverages Ltd v. ACIT ( 2018) 195 TTJ 76 ( Delhi ) (Trib)

S. 153A : Assessment – Search- Share Capital and Share premium – Statement recorded- No incriminating material was found in the course of search – Order is bad in law . [S. 68,132,132(4) ]

ITO v. Abhinand Investment Ltd. (2018) 192 TTJ 51(UO) (Kol)( Trib)

S. 36(1)(iii):Interest on borrowed capital – Loan taken for purchase of shares – Shares held as stock in trade – Business expenditure – Accepted in earlier year – Allowable as deduction- Department cannot take a different stand . [S. 37(1)]

Hortus Consultants Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2018) 192 TTJ 465 / 165 DTR 147 (Hyd) (Trib)

S. 28(i): Business income -Agricultural income- Contract of growing and transporting grass – Growing and extracting grass – Agricultural Income – Transporting and relaying grass – Service – Business income. [ S. 2(1A),10(1)]

ITO v.The Times Centre For Media And Management Studies. (2018) 168 DTR 14/194 TTJ 715 (Delhi) ( Trib)

S. 11: Property held for charitable purposes-Dividend income – Income can be taxed if the investment is in violation of the provision -Exemption cannot be denied to the Trust in respect of other income .[ S. 11(5), 12AA,13(1)(d)]

Precilion Holdings Limited v. DCIT( 2019) 412 ITR 43/262 Taxman 228 / 177 DTR 441 /(2020) 314 CTR 507(Bom)(HC), www.itatonline.org Editorial : SLP of revenue is dismissed ,DCIT v Precilion Holdings Ltd ( 2019) 418 ITR 15 (St)/( 2020) 269 Taxman 488

S. 147: Reassessment -After the expiry of four years -If the AO is of the opinion that the issue requires verification, it tantamounts to fishing or roving inquiry. He is not permitted to reopen merely because in the later year, he took a different view on the basis of similar material-.Even if the question of taxing interest income under the DTAA was not in the mind of the AO when he passed the assessment, he cannot reopen if there is no failure to disclose truly and fully all material facts- Reassessment is held to be not valid-DTAA-India -Cyprus . [ S.148,, Art. 11(2). ]

Shamim Imtiaz Hingora v. ITO (SMC) (Pune) (Trib) ,www.itatonline.org.

S. 68: Cash credits- Bogus Capital gains-Penny Stocks-Though the AO did not find any mistake in the documentation furnished by the assessee, there is need for finding of fact on (i) the nature of the shares transactions; (ii) make-believe nature of paper work; (iii) Camouflage the bogus nature; and, (iv) the relevance of human probabilities etc – Addition is confirmed as cash credits [S.10(38) 45]

CIT v. Tasgaon Taluka Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd ( 2019)103 taxmann.com 57 / 262 Taxman 176/ 412 ITR 420 / 307 CTR 473/ 175 DTR 345(SC), www.itatonline.org/Editorial :Review petition is dismissed ,Sharad Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. v. CIT (2024) 298 Taxman 191 (SC)

S.37(1): Business expenditure – Diversion by overriding title -Sharing of profit-The AO has to take into account the manner in which the business works, the modalities and manner in which SAP/additional purchase price/final price are decided and determine what amount forms part of the profit -Whatever is the profit component is sharing of profit/distribution of profit and the rest is deductible as expenditure –question of law is answered partly in favour of the revenue and partly in favour of the assessee- Matter is remitted to the AO to undertake the exercise as stated in the judgement after giving an opportunity to the respective assesses. [ S.40A(2),Sugarcane ( Control) Order 1966 clauses , 3, 5A ]

Board of Control for Cricket in India v. ACIT (TDS) (2018) 68 ITR 372/ 196 TTJ 1057 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 272A : Penalty — delay in filing statement of tax deducted at source — difficulties in initial stage of change from manual filing to electronic filing of returns – plausible explanation given – Levy of penalty is held to be not justified. [S. 200(3), 272A(2)(k), 273B]