Year: 2019

Archive for 2019


CIT v. CIT, Belgaum Urban Development Authority (2018) 304 CTR 994 / 170 DTR 279 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Maintainability-Small tax effect—the “tax effect” is much less than Rs. 20,00,000 for all the assessment years taken together and no material on record to show that the present appeals filed by the Revenue have any cascading effect—Therefore, the appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.

Amore Jewels (P) Ltd. v. DCIT (2018) 305 CTR 305 / 169 DTR 369 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 254(2) : Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record – Non consideration of case laws cited by Assessee during the hearing by Tribunal-Impugned order passed by the Tribunal dismissing the Assessee’s Miscellaneous Application as well as the Appellate order are set aside. [S. 254(1)]

Ambience Developers & Infrastructures (P) Ltd. v. CIT (2018) 171 DTR 369/( 2019) 410 ITR 289/ 307 CTR 516 (Delhi)(HC) Ambience Hotels & Resorts v. CIT (2018) 171 DTR 369 (2019) 410 ITR 289 / 307 CTR 516 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 254(2) : Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record–Transfer of income where there is no transfer of assets – Clubbing of income–Tribunal’s original order requires no rectification as it also considered reasoning of CIT(A) who took note of all the judgements relied by Assessee. [S. 60, 63]

Bellad Bagewadi Krishi Seva Sahakari Bank Ltd. v. ITO (2018) 171 DTR 140 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Duties-Co-operative societies-Tribunal while considering the issue of deduction under S. 80P(2)(a)(i) to Assessee suddenly shifted to Section 80P(4) and held that the assessee is not entitled for the benefit of S. 80P(4) without providing an opportunity to the Assessee- Order of Tribunal s set aside. [S.80P(2)(a)(i), 80P(4)]

CIT v. Fertilizers and Chemicals Travancore Ltd. (2018) 166 DTR 181/ (2019) 307 CTR 349 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 234 B : Interest-Advance tax-Interest is chargeable at the rate provided under S.234B(3) of the Act on the differential tax payable on reassessment – as even before the regular assessment the tax paid under S. 140A was returned with interest and Department did not have any benefit of the amounts. [S. 140A, 234B(3)]

Ayush Kataria v. UOI (2018) 305 CTR 110 / 170 DTR 408 (MP)(HC)

S. 226 : Collection and recovery -Arrest and Detention- Since the detenue did not co-operate with IT Dept in any manner and the TRO has followed all the due procedure before his arrest, there was no need to produce Assessee before the Magistrate and no violation has been made under Art. 21 of the Constitution of India – Writ of habeas corpus is dismissed [R. 73, 76, CRPC, S. 57, Art. 21]

Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. ITAT (2018) 305 CTR 891 / 172 DTR 33 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Time available for filing appeal-Interim protection granted to the petitioners shall continue till the stay petitions in the tax case appeals are heard- During appeal time, if recovery proceedings are initiated, it would virtually render the appeal as infructuous.[S. 260A]

CIT .v. Jeevan Telecasting Corporation Ltd. (2018) 305 CTR 1001 / 171 DTR 145 / (2020)423 ITR 496 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 201 : Deduction at source – Failure to deduct or pay –Remand matter – Tribunal being final fact finding body ought to have looked into facts of present case rather making a remand basis Supreme Court’s decision- Appeal of the revenue is partly allowed. [S. 271C]

Badshah Enterprises .v. AO (2018) 169 DTR 2 (Bom.)( HC)

S. 184 : Firm–Registration-Firm-Assessment as a firm-Failure to file certified copy of partnership deed along with return – There is no change either in the constitution or in the shares of the partners–S. 184(3) allows the status/benefit of being assessed as a partnership firm if in an earlier assessment it was so assessed–Hence, the firm would continue to be assessed as a partnership firm in the subject assessment year despite not filing the certified partnership deed with the return of income filed.

Chandra Mohan Tiwari .v. ITO (2018) 168 DTR 251/(2020) 314 CTR 750 (All.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment – Within four years- No where it has been mentioned that the property has been purchased by the assessee as a trustee/agent of the trust instead evidences prove Assessee himself to be the purchaser – Hence, re-opening is valid. [S. 148]