Year: 2019

Archive for 2019


Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (IT) (2018) 97 taxmann.com 637 / 170 DTR 433 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment – Survey -Non disclosure of Royalty and FTS in the original return-Reassessment is held to be justified. [S. 133A, 148]

T T K Prestige Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2018) 97 taxmann.com 112 / 169 DTR 409 / 304 CTR 689 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment–Notice-License fee-Use of logo -Capital or revenue – Reopening solely based on audit objections not permitted as it amounts to change of opinion. [S. 37(1), 147]

Principal Officer, Honda Access Asia & Oceania Co. Ltd. v. ADIT (2018) 168 DTR 425 / 255 Taxman 77 / 304 CTR 108(SC) Principal Officer, Honda Access Asia & Oceania Co. Ltd. v. ADIT. (2018) 168 DTR 426/255 Taxman 77 (SC) Editorial: Principal Officer, Honda Access Asia & Oceania Co. Ltd. v. ADIT(IT) ( 2014) 271 CTR 663 / 108 DTR 201 /368 ITR 401/226 Taxman 204 (All)(HC) is set aside

S. 147 : Reassessment–Based on subsequent finding of DRP that there was no Permanent Establishment of the assessee in India– AO dropped reassessment proceedings–Order passed by High Court upholding validity of those proceedings was to be set aside. [S. 148]

Shiv Tiwari & Ors. v. PCDIT (Inv.). (2018) 171 DTR 209/ 305 CTR 307 (Raj.)(HC)

S. 132A : Powers-Requisition of books of account–Reasons to believe to issue requisition notice not required to be disclosed to any person or Authority or Appellate Tribunal. [S. 254(1)]

Swiss RE Global Business Solutions India (P) Ltd. v. ACIT (2018) 169 DTR 313 / 304 CTR 714 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arms’ length price–Selection of comparables-Remand to the AO-Held to be proper. [S. 254(1)]

Toyota Kirloskar Motor (P) Ltd. v. CIT (2018) 170 DTR 246/ 305 CTR 206 / (2020) 424 ITR 212 (Karn.)(HC)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arms’ length price–Tribunal’s remand for ALP determination on a combined basis not an academic exercise- Order of Tribunal is affirmed. [S. 254(1)]

PCIT v. Technimont Pvt. Ltd. (2018) 168 DTR 377 / 304 CTR 145 / 102 CCH 305 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Interest chargeable on delayed recovery of export receivables and expenses–LIBOR rates should be taken instead of SBI PLR. [S. 144C]

Vijay Jain v. CIT(A) (2018) 170 DTR 395/ ( 2019) 308 CTR 411 (MP)(HC)

S. 69 : Unexplained investments–Unable to rebut a statement made against him and failure to explain the source- Statement could not be read in piecemeal depending on what part suits to the assessee and what part does not – Addition is held to be justified. [S. 131]

Shubha Devi G. v. ITO (2018) 171 DTR 51 /( 2019) 307 CTR 536(Karn.)(HC)

S. 68 : Cash credits–Advance received back -Source of money was sufficiently explained-Addition is held to be not justified.

PCIT v. Reliable Express (2018) 168 DTR 337 / 101 CCH 402 (MP.)(HC)

S. 68 : Cash credits – Identity of the depositor, genuineness of the transaction- Onus discharged – Deletion of addition is held to be justified.