Year: 2019

Archive for 2019


Nate Nandha v. ACIT (2018) 65 ITR 72(SN) (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 15 : Salaries-The Income-tax Act, 1961 will override the Companies Act- Even the illegal payment or the payment received by the assessee contrary to the provisions of the Companies Act by way of salary has to be assessed as income in the assessee’s hands provided the income was not recovered by the company. [S. 5]

Bank of Ceylon. v. DCIT (2018) 65 ITR 83 (SN) (Chennnai ) (Trib)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty – Concealment – Inaccurate particulars – Show cause should mention specific charge – Word used in notice “or” and not “and” — Levy of penalty is held to be not valid [S.274 ]

ACIT v.Surumy Mammotty (Smt.) (2018) 65 ITR 85 (Chennai) (Trib)

S. 153C : Assessment – Income of any other person – Search -No incriminating material was found during course of search — Assessment is not valid.[ S.153A ]

DCIT v. Mittal Corporation Ltd. (2018) 65 ITR 65 (SN) (Indore) (Trib)

S. 145A : Method of accounting – Valuation – Excise duty and taxes – Recorded purchases net of taxes —Not required to add excise duty and other taxes while valuing closing stock .[ Accounting Standard,2. ]

M. P. Mehrotra (HUF) v. DCIT (2018) 65 ITR 71 (SN) (Delhi) (Trib)

S.45: Capital gains — Business income —Shares and securities – Conversion of stock-in-trade into investment – Held to be valid -Gains assessable as capital gains. [ S.28(i) ]

ITO v. Divyam TIE-UP Pvt. Ltd. (2018) 65 ITR 75( SN) (Kol.) (Trib)

S.45: Capital gains — Business income — Sale of shares- Principle of consistency- Preceding and subsequent years department , accepting income on account of sale of investments as short term capital gains- Sale consideration is assessable as capital gains .[ S.28(i) ]

DPJ Viniyog P. Ltd. v. DCIT (2018) 65 ITR 74 (SN)(Kol.) (Trib)

S.45: Capital gains — Business income – Investment in shares -Consistently valuing investment at cost -Profits on sale of sale of investment is assessable as capital gains .[ S.28(i) ]

India Agro Exports P. Ltd. v. ITO (2018) 65 ITR 81 ( SN) (Chennai) (Trib)

S. 10B: Export oriented undertakings – Manufacture -Processed Foods, Pickles, Fresh Fruits and vegetables — Neither the AO nor the Assessee brought on record the process of manufacturing activities – Matter remanded to the AO to find out whether there was manufacture per se, or not, what was the break-up of the exports of the processed foods, pickles, fresh vegetables and fruits separately, and after determining all the facts, the Assessing Officer shall re -adjudicate the issue after granting the assessee adequate opportunity to substantiate its case.

Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. DCIT (2018) 173 ITD 130 / 196 TTJ 318/ 66 ITR 33 (SN)(Ahd.) (Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue – In the course of scrutiny assessment, AO disallowed a part of business advancement expenses after verifying bills and vouchers- Manufacturing – R& D expenditure – Revision for further disallowance, re-determined claim of deduction under S. 80-IC and 80-IE and Weighted deduction-R& D expenditure – Revision is held to be not justified when in the Course of original assessment the AO has examined all the claims. [S. 35, 80IC, 80IE]

Nitesh Agarwal v. ACIT (2018) 173 ITD 14 / 196 TTJ 27 (UO)(Jaipur)(Trib.)

S. 253 : Appellate Tribunal-Condonation of delay of 387 days-turbulent time in family as well as with his earlier Chartered Accountant -Copy of complaint against the Chartered Accountant was also filed before the various authorities including the Court of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Jaipur. – Delay was condoned .[S. 254(1)]