Year: 2019

Archive for 2019


Milestone Real Estate Fund v. ACIT (2018) 172 ITD 370 (Mum.)(Trib)

S. 10(23FB) : Venture capital fund-Exemption-Real estate business-Since real estate sector was removed from the negative list with effect from 5-4-2004, much before the assessee came in to existence -Entitle to exemption-Revision order is held to be bad in law. [S. 115U, 263]

Chandigarh Institute of Hotel Management & Catering Technology (CIHMCT) v. DCIT (2018) 172 ITD 356 (Chd.)(Trib.)

S. 10(23C) : Educational institution-Society running a non profit educational institution- Exemption cannot be denied merely because assessee was simultaneously running profitable hotel, when the exemption was claimed only for educational activities- Matter remanded. [S. 10(23)(iiiab)]

ITO v. Anil Batra. (2018) 409 ITR 428 (Delhi)(HC)

S. 276B : Offences and prosecutions-Failure to pay to the credit tax deducted at source–Directors in charge, to show that offence occurred without their knowledge or due diligence exercised by them to prevent commission of offence-Non-issuance of separate notices, does not absolve directors in charge-Order f lower courts acquitting directors is held to be erroneous-Benefit of probation granted to accused directors of assessee and levy of fine. [S. 2(35), 278B]

CIT v. Jeppiar (2018) 409 ITR 511 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 260A : Appeal High Court-Abatement of proceedings- Death of assessee on 18-6-2016-Legal heirs not brought on record in spite of time given repeatedly to revenue-Proceedings abated.

A. Sridevi (Smt.) v. ITO (2018) 409 ITR 502/ 172 DTR 433 /( 2019) 260 Taxman 181/ 306 CTR 81 (Mad.)(HC) Editorial: Affirmed the order of single judge, A. Sridevi (Smt.) v. ITO (2018) 408 ITR 83/ 171 DTR 417/ 305 CTR 670/( 2019) 260 Taxman 76 (Mad) (HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Second reassessment-New tangible material was found- Reassessment is valid-Order of single judge is affirmed. [S. 148, 149(1)(b)]

Innovative Foods Ltd. v. UOI (2018) 409 ITR 415 (Ker.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment—Within four years-Deduction allowed without discussion in original assessment — Reassessment on the ground that excess deduction was allowed is held to be valid. [S. 148]

Tractors and Farm Equipment Ltd. v. ACIT (2018) 409 ITR 369 /( 2019) 175 DTR 312/ (2020) 314 CTR 490(Mad.) (HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-Beyond four years-Explanation 3, to S.147 by Finance (No. 2) Act, 2009-After issuing a notice under S. 148, he accepts the contention of the assessee and holds that the income which he has initially formed a reason to believe had escaped assessment, has as a matter of fact not escaped assessment, it is not open to him independently to assess some other income-If he intends to do so, a fresh notice under S.148 would be necessary- Assessing Officer has no power to reassess other income not mentioned in notice under S 148. [S. 148]

CIT v. TTK LIG Ltd. (2018) 409 ITR 390 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 80HHC : Export business-Income derived-Profits due to exchange fluctuation and provision written back–Entitle to deduction.

CIT v. Ceebros Hotels Pvt. Ltd. (2018) 409 ITR 423/( 2019) 261 Taxman 41 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 35AD : Deduction in respect of expenditure on specified business-Hotel business- Certification of Hotel as three-Star Category Hotel in subsequent year-Deduction cannot be denied on the ground that Certification was in later year. [S. 35D(5)(aa)]

CIT v. Gujarat State Fertilizers And Chemicals Ltd. (2018) 409 ITR 378 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 28(i) : Business loss-Fertiliser Bonds Issued By Central Government In Lieu of subsidy-Sale of Bonds at price Lower than face value-Loss is allowable as business Loss.