Year: 2019

Archive for 2019


Karur Vysya Bank Ltd. v. CIT (2019) 416 ITR 166 / 311 CTR 824/ 184 DTR 8(Mad)( HC)

S. 264 :Commissioner – Revision of other orders – Amount mistakenly paid as tax- Revision is not maintainable – Duty of the revenue to refund the amount- Substantial justice should prevail over technical considerations . [ S.119 ]

Kammavari Credit Co-Operative Society Ltd . v. ACIT (2019) 416 ITR 180 (Karn)(HC)

S. 264 :Commissioner – Revision of other orders – Application for condonation of delay cannot be dismissed for technical reasons —Principle of substantial justice- Matter remanded . [ S.80P ]

CIT v. Dr. K. C. G. Verghese (Late) (2019) 416 ITR 155 (Mad) (HC)

S. 158BFA : Block assessment – Penalty – Legal representative-
No proceedings for penalty for concealment of income was initiated against person prior to his death — Penalty cannot be imposed on legal representatives .[ S. 158BC, 159 271(1)( c ) ]

Jarun Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2019) 416 ITR 249 (Guj)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment –With in four years- Change of opinion- Details were submitted in the original assessment proceedings – Reassessment for purpose of verification and investigation is held to be not valid .[ S.148 ]

North Eastern Electric Power Corporation Limited And Another. v. CIT (2019) 416 ITR 205 / 182 DTR 233/ 310 CTR 856(Meghalaya) (HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years- Failure to disclose material facts – Reassessment notice is held to be valid- Disputed questions of facts — Alternative remedy of appeal – Notice of reassessment is held to be valid .[ S.148 , 151 , Art .226 ]

Infosys Ltd. v. DCIT (2019) 416 ITR 226/ 182 DTR 308/( 2020) 312 CTR 61 (Karn)(HC)

S.147: Reassessment-After the expiry of four years- No failure to disclose material facts – Denial of exemption in subsequent year is not aground for reassessment .[ S. 10A, 148 ]

Prathyusha Educational Trust. v. CIT (2019) 416 ITR 129/ 266 Taxman 105/ 310 CTR 545 (Mad)(HC) Editorial: SLP of the assessee is dismissed Prathyusha Educational Trust. v. CIT (2019) 416 ITR 132 (SC)

S. 144 : Best judgment assessment – Not responding to notices and summons – Best judgement order is held to be valid – Cancellation of registration and exemption is also held to be valid . [ S.10 (23C) (vi), 12AA, 132, 142(1) 143(2) 153A ]

CIT v. Rajiv Gupta. (2019) 416 ITR 199/181 CTR 116 / 310 CTR 379/ 267 Taxman 305 (Delhi) (HC) CIT v. Ajay Kumar Gupta (2019) 416 ITR 199//181 CTR 116 / 310 CTR 379 (Delhi) (HC)

S. 144 : Best judgment assessment –Accommodation entries – Purchase of fictitious silver items – Unexplained sales – Sales not substantiated by providing identity and credit worthiness of buyers – Rejection of books of account is held to be proper – Cryptic order -Addition made by the AO is affirmed .[ S.132, 145(3) , Voluntary Disclosure Of Income Scheme, 1997 .]

CIT v. Mahipinder Singh Sandhu (2019) 416 ITR 175/ 182 DTR 369/ 311 CTR 116 (P&H) (HC)

S. 54EC : Capital gains – Investment in bonds -Part consideration in escrow account – Invested in the year of receipt -Entitle to exemption .[ S.45 ]

CIT v. Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizer and Chemicals Ltd. (2019) 416 ITR 144/ 266 Taxman 19 (Mag)/ 311 CTR 556 / 184 DTR 84 (Guj)(HC)

S. 40(a)(ia): Amounts not deductible – Deduction at source – Sale transaction trough dealers on principal -to -principal basis –Dealer could not be considered as commission agent of the assessee- Not liable to deduct tax at source- No disallowances can be made . [ S.194H ]