S. 18(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-In the absence of any proof to show that there was an attempt on the part of the assessee to conceal the particulars or to furnish inaccurate particulars, the levy of penalty was not justified by invoking the deeming provision of Expln. 3 to S. 18(1).
S. 2(ea)(v) : Urban Land-Appeal-Maintainability-Law tax effect-Question of law has now been settled by the Supreme Court-Repeated instances of such question of law arising does not arise at all, since the WT Act is no more in force-In such circumstances though the question of law has to be answered in favour of the Revenue, there need be no recovery steps taken for reason of the appeals being below the monetary limits. [S. 260A, 268A]
S. 275 : Penalty–Concealment-Limitation-Appeal effect order having been passed by AO on 22nd May, 201-The six month period of limitation under will begin to run from that date—Penalty order passed by AO on 26th April, 2018, passed beyond six months, was barred by limitation. [S. 271(1)(c), 275 (1)(a)]
S. 271AAB : Penalty-Search initiated on or after 1st day of July 2012-Entries in the books of account–No penalty can be levied. [S. 2(12A)]
S. 271AAA : Penalty-Search initiated on or after 1st June, 2007–Common appeal filed–Wrong advice–Delay was condoned–Matter remanded. [S. 246A, 271(1)(c)].
S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty–Concealment–Explanation given by the assessee is not proved to be false-Levy of penalty is held to be not valid. [S. 69A, 271AAA]
S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Interest on fixed deposit receipts– Messing commission-Shown as exempt income–Levy of penalty is held to be not valid. [S. 148]
S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Surrender of income voluntarily– Penalty cannot be levied.
S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty–Concealment–Recording of satisfaction-In applicable portions are not struck off-Levy of penalty is held to be not valid.
S. 271(1)(b) : Penalty-Failure to comply with notices-Alleged bank account not belong to assessee–No failure on part of assessee-No penalty can be levied. [S. 142(1)]