Month: February 2020

Archive for February, 2020


NIIT Ltd. v. DCIT (2020) 180 ITD 141 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 251 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)–Powers–CIT (A) cannot dismiss appeal against penalty merely stating that in quantum proceedings additions has been confirmed; in penalty appeal, he has to mention point for determination again and reasons for levy-Matter remanded. [S.271(1)(c)].

Narendra Solvex (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2020) 180 ITD 64 (Mum.) (Trib.)

S. 246 : Appeal-Deputy Commissioner (Appeals)-Appealable orders-Order passed by AO giving effect to directions of Tribunal, is an appealable order before CIT(A). [S.246A, 254(1)]

ACIT v. Y. Venkanna Choudary. (2019) 180 ITD 166/ ( 2020) 186 DTR 239/ 203 TTJ 891 (Vishakha)(Trib.)

S. 56 : Income from other sources-Share premium-Two share holders-Brothers-Excess benefit was passed on to assessee was out of shareholding held by his brother-Provisions of S. 56(2)(viii)(c)(ii) would not apply-Balance sheet-Previous Balance Sheet which is audited and approved in AGM has to be taken into consideration, before allotment of shares. [S.56(2)(viii)(c)(ii), R.11U, 11UA].

ITO v. Bajaj Udyog. (2020) 180 ITD 77 / 204 TTJ 5/ 189 DTR 246 (Jaipur)(Trib.)

S. 50C : Capital gains-Full value of consideration-Stamp valuation-variation is only 1.49%-Value declared to be adopted-Amendment brought in section 55A(a) by Finance Act, 2012, has to be read prospectively; such amendment shall apply to transactions which are effected during period started on or after 1-7-2012. [S.45, 55A(a)]

LIC Housing Finance Ltd. (2020) 180 ITD 45 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 43D : Public financial institutions-NHB guidelines will not bring automatic corresponding change in rule 6EB since, discretion is left to rule making authority to follow or not follow NHB guidelines as and when they are revised–Addition is held to be not valid. [S. 145, R 6EB]

NIIT Ltd. v. DCIT (2020) 180 ITD 141 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Finance lease-Rent paid during lease period is held to be allowable as business expenditure.

DCIT v. AGC Network Ltd. (2020) 180 ITD 204 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Expenditure incurred for construction of any structure or extension or improvement of building taken on lease would be treated as capital expenditure-Repair/renovation of leased premises–Held to be allowable as revenue expenditure.

DCIT v. AGC Network Ltd. (2020) 180 ITD 204 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure–Provision for liability on estimated basis –Held to be allowable as deduction–Change in method of accounting – Matter remanded. [S.145, AS-1]

LIC Housing Finance Ltd. (2020) 180 ITD 45 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 36(1)(viii) : Eligible business-Special reserve–General reserve-Balance in profit and loss account, which is not in nature of any other reserve having specific objectives, would not form part of ‘general reserves’ for purpose of proviso to S 36(1)(viii) of the Act

DCIT v. AGC Network Ltd. (2020) 180 ITD 204 (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 36(1)(vii) : Bad debt–Non furnishing of TDS certificate amounts to amount due–Allowable as bad debt-Cannot be disallowed on ground that it was not within time prescribed under S. 155(14) of the Act.[S. 37(1), 155(14)]