Year: 2020

Archive for 2020


Shreya Vidyarthi v. Ashok Vidyarthi AIR 2016 SC 139/ MANU/SC/1465/2015

Insurance Act, 1938

S. 39: Nomination by policy holder – Rights of Nominee – Joint family property(HUF) – Insurance Amount received by nominee/wife – Such amounts constitute the entitlement of all legal heirs of deceased. [Hindu Succession Act, 1956; S.6, Specific Relief Act, 1963]

B. K. Educational Services Pvt Ltd v. Parag Gupta & Associates AIR 2018 SC 5601 / (2019) 11 SCC 633 (SC)

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016

S. 238A: Limitation – Time-barred debts – Section 5 of the Limitation Act may be applied to condone delay in filing applications under Section 7 and Section 9 and the provisions of the Limitation Act applied from the inception of the Code i.e. to applications filed under the Code even prior to 6-6-2018. [Constitution of India 1949, Art 137, Limitation Act, 1963 S. 5, 7]

Rajesh Tiwari, Advocate v. Alok Pandey, Chief Judicial Magistrate (2019) 6 SCC 465 (SC)

Contempt of Courts Act , 1971

S. 2(a) :Contempt of Court – Advocate- Judicial independence and courage to be shown while delivering the justice. [Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) , S. 156(3), Advocate Act, 1961, S 30, S 34]

Youth Bar Association of India v. UOI AIR 2016 SC 4136/(2016) 9 SCC 473/MANU/ SC/1339/2016

Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973

S.154: Information in cognizable cases -First Information Report ( FIR) – Supply of copy to accused – Guidelines – Copies of FIRs, except in sensitive cases like sexual offences, offences pertaining to insurgency and terrorism, should be uploaded on websites within 24 hours of registration. [S. 207 , 438, Constitution of India , Art , 21 , 22(1), 32 ]

Badru (since deceased) through L.R. & Ors. v. NTPC Limited & Ors. AIR 2019 SC 3385/2019 SCC OnLine SC 859/ MANU/SC/ 0911/2019

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908

Order XLI Rule 22: Cross Objection has to be disposed of independently on merits.

Shabina Abraham and Ors. v. CCE (2015) 10 SCC 770/ (2015) 52 GST 30 (SC)/ 2015 (322) ELT 372 (SC)

Central Excise Act, 1944

S.4 : Assessee – Death of assessee – Assessment abates and legal representative not liable unless specifically provided for in the taxing statute .[ S. 3, 2, 4(3)(a) ]

R.K. Garg v. UOI ( 1981) 4 SCC 675 / 1981 AIR 2138 (SC) / 1982 SCR (1) 947 /(1982 ) 133 ITR 329 (SC)

Special Bearer Bonds (Immunities & Exemptions) Ordinance, 1981( 1981) 127 ITR 55 (St)
Special Bearer Bonds ( Immunities and Exemption ) Act , 1981 ( 1981) 129 ITR 30 (St)

S.3 : Immunities – Enacted retrospectively—Legislative power conferred on the President under Article 123—Is co-extensive with power of Parliament to make laws—Constitutional validity—Legislative intent behind enactment of the Bearer Bonds Act, 1981 is to combat menacing problem of black money— Classification between holders of black money and others made by the impugned Act is practical, real, intelligible and not arbitrary and irrational limited in scope— Bearer Bonds Act, 1981 accordingly is not violative of Art. 14 of Constitution. [ Constitution of India , Art , 14 , 123 ]

UOI v. M.V. Valliappan (1999) 238 ITR 1027/105 Taxman 605/155 CTR 193 (SC)

S. 171 : Partition – Assessment – Hindu undivided family – Provision that partial partitions after 31-12-78, not to be recognised for income tax and wealth tax purposes – Provision within legislative competence of Parliament – Not ultra vires charging section – Cut-off date not discriminatory. [Wealth-tax Act, 1957, S. 20A. Constitution of India, art. 14; Sch VII, List I, item 82]

Ravi Agarwal v. UOI (2019) 410 ITR 399 / 173 DTR 194 / 306 CTR 177 / 260 Taxman 352 (SC)

S. 80DD: Medical treatment of dependent – Observations – Disability – Jeevan Aadhar – Amount of annuity under the policy is to be released only after the death of the person assured – Purpose is to secure the future of the person suffering from disability, after the death of the parent/guardian – Provision is valid in law – Considering the several difficult situations where the handicapped person may need the payment on annuity or lumpsum basis even during the life time of their parents/guardians, it is for the legislature to take care of theses aspects and to provide suitable provision by making necessary amendments in S.80DD. [Constitution of India Art. 14, 32]

Mangalore Ganesh Beedi Works v. CIT (2015) 378 ITR 640 / 280 CTR 521 / 126 DTR 233 (SC)

S.32 : Depreciation – Prior to 1.4.1999 – Intangible assets – Acquisition of trademarks, copyright and know-how of erstwhile firm – Held, intellectual property rights such as trademarks, copyrights and know-how constitute “plant” for purposes of depreciation – The department is not entitled to rewrite the terms of a commercial agreement. [S. 35A, 35AB, 43(3)]